California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB1386

Introduced
2/16/18  
Introduced
2/16/18  
Refer
3/8/18  
Refer
3/8/18  
Refer
3/22/18  
Refer
3/22/18  
Refer
4/4/18  
Refer
4/4/18  
Refer
4/12/18  
Refer
4/12/18  
Refer
4/19/18  
Refer
4/19/18  
Report Pass
4/24/18  
Report Pass
4/24/18  
Refer
4/24/18  
Refer
4/24/18  
Report Pass
5/22/18  
Engrossed
5/29/18  
Refer
6/4/18  
Refer
6/4/18  
Refer
6/12/18  
Refer
6/12/18  
Report Pass
6/20/18  
Report Pass
6/20/18  
Refer
6/21/18  
Refer
6/21/18  
Report Pass
8/15/18  
Report Pass
8/15/18  
Enrolled
8/24/18  
Enrolled
8/24/18  
Chaptered
9/10/18  
Chaptered
9/10/18  

Caption

Optometry.

Impact

The changes introduced by SB 1386 are expected to have a significant impact on the operational framework for optometrists in California. Specifically, the bill limits the number of offices an individual optometrist can operate to a maximum of eleven. This provision is designed to prevent the over-expansion of optometry practices, thereby securing better quality of care. Furthermore, the bill reinforces the standards of practice that optometrists must adhere to, aligning them more closely with those expected of physicians and surgeons, thereby potentially elevating patient care standards across the state.

Summary

Senate Bill 1386 amends the Optometry Practice Act by updating regulations related to the licensure and practice of optometry in California. The bill's primary objective is to enhance accountability and oversight within the optometry field. This includes removing an exemption for licensed optometrists who hold branch office licenses from the requirement to notify the State Board of Optometry regarding their practice addresses. The bill stipulates that practitioners must obtain statements of licensure for each practice location, which is aimed at ensuring compliance and reducing unauthorized practice of optometry.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 1386 appears to be largely supportive among legislators advocating for more structured oversight of the optometry profession. Proponents argue that the bill will help maintain professional standards and protect public health by ensuring that all practitioners are suitably licensed and accountable. However, there may be concerns from some optometrists about the potential administrative burden associated with complying with the new requirements, particularly regarding the management of their practice locations.

Contention

Notably, the bill incorporates provisions that expand the scope of what constitutes a violation of the optometry practice regulations, thus imposing a new layer of legal accountability. The lack of required reimbursement to local agencies for administrative costs arising from the implementation of these new rules could also be a point of contention among stakeholders. Debates may arise over how these measures could affect local practice dynamics and the economic implications for smaller optometry businesses or practitioners.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB509

Optometry: COVID-19 pandemic: temporary licenses.

CA AB458

Optometrists: home residence permit.

CA SB776

Optometry.

CA AB896

Registered Dispensing Opticians: Dispensing Opticians Fund: Optometry Fund: mobile optometric offices.