California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB1509

Introduced
3/21/18  
Introduced
3/21/18  
Refer
4/4/18  
Refer
4/4/18  
Report Pass
4/25/18  
Refer
4/25/18  
Refer
4/25/18  
Engrossed
5/10/18  
Refer
5/25/18  
Refer
5/25/18  
Refer
6/19/18  
Refer
6/19/18  
Report Pass
6/27/18  
Refer
6/27/18  
Refer
6/27/18  
Report Pass
8/8/18  
Enrolled
8/24/18  
Enrolled
8/24/18  
Chaptered
9/29/18  
Chaptered
9/29/18  
Passed
9/29/18  

Caption

State finance.

Impact

One significant impact of SB 1509 is the exemption granted to the Treasurer from the Administrative Procedure Act when entering into agreements related to the sale and administration of state bonds. By doing so, the bill allows for a more streamlined approach, where the Treasurer is not required to follow the usual administrative rule-making processes that might delay bond offerings. This exemption is expected to reduce the time and complexity involved in administering bond sales, making it more responsive to market conditions.

Summary

Senate Bill 1509, enacted in 2018, amends Section 5703 of the California Government Code, focusing on the regulation of state finance. The bill clarifies the role of the Treasurer as the sole agent for the offering and selling of state bonds. It mandates that the Treasurer develop a competitive process for selecting underwriters for negotiated bond offerings, ensuring transparency and accountability in these financial transactions. This update to existing law is intended to enhance the efficiency of bond sales while maintaining oversight of the financial processes involved.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 1509 has been largely positive among fiscal policymakers and financial professionals. Proponents argue that it equips the Treasurer with the necessary flexibility to act swiftly in bond markets, potentially leading to better financial outcomes for the state. However, some critics raise concerns regarding the lack of oversight that comes from exempting the Treasurer from certain procedural requirements, cautioning that this may lead to reduced accountability in the process of selecting underwriters.

Contention

Notable contention surrounding the bill primarily reflects concerns about transparency and accountability in the handling of state finances. Critics worry that bypassing established procedures could lead to favoritism or a lack of competition among underwriting firms. Moreover, the administrative exemption could hide important financial details from public scrutiny, prompting calls for additional safeguards to ensure that the selection process for underwriters remains fair and equitable.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB848

Public contracts: University of California: California State University: domestic workers.

FL H1503

Citizens Property Insurance Corporation

FL S0002

Property Insurance

AL SB217

Require bond financing agreement documents to include schedule of debt obligation of county

FL H0013

Windstorm Coverage by Citizens Property Insurance Corporation

IL HB3551

PROCUREMENT CD-SINGLE PRIME

CA SB225

Community Anti-Displacement and Preservation Program: statewide contract.

FL H1213

Windstorm Coverage by Citizens Property Insurance Corporation