Developmental services: Canyon Springs Community Facility.
Impact
The enactment of SB 175 modifies existing laws regarding the commitment of individuals with developmental disabilities. Specifically, it amends Sections of the Welfare and Institutions Code to include Canyon Springs as an acceptable facility for temporary commitment. This adjustment reflects a significant shift in state policy toward the management of mental health crises, recognizing the necessity of timely intervention to prevent further deterioration of health in affected individuals. The bill incorporates additional provisions that align with legislative changes proposed in SB 1494, thus facilitating a broader reform in the state’s approach to developmental services.
Summary
Senate Bill No. 175, introduced by Senator McGuire, addresses the need for mental health treatment options for individuals with developmental disabilities who present a danger to themselves or others. The bill allows courts to order the commitment of individuals experiencing an acute crisis to a designated unit of the Canyon Springs Community Facility until June 30, 2021. This provision aims to provide immediate assistance to individuals in urgent need of mental health services, reflecting the critical shortage of appropriate placement options in the state. The bill’s urgency is underscored by its immediate enactment following approval by the governor on September 28, 2018.
Sentiment
The overall sentiment surrounding SB 175 appears to be supportive among legislators and advocates for mental health services. By enabling quicker access to treatment for individuals in crisis, the bill has been viewed favorably as a progressive step toward addressing gaps in mental health care. However, there are underlying concerns about the targeted use of Canyon Springs and whether adequate resources will be allocated to meet the needs of individuals committed under this law. As a result, while the intent is broadly positive, there remains caution regarding implementation and resource availability.
Contention
One notable point of contention relates to the limitations imposed by the bill regarding the time frame for commitments and the criteria for determining acute crises. While the allocation of up to 10 beds for this purpose is seen as a necessary measure, questions arise about the capacity of Canyon Springs to handle additional patients effectively, considering the previous limitations on state mental health facilities. The bill introduces specific operational changes that may impact the rights and experiences of individuals undergoing commitment, thereby inviting discussions about appropriate balances between public safety and individual rights.