California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB241

Introduced
2/6/17  
Introduced
2/6/17  
Refer
2/16/17  
Refer
2/16/17  
Report Pass
3/30/17  
Report Pass
3/30/17  
Refer
3/30/17  
Refer
3/30/17  
Report Pass
4/26/17  
Refer
4/26/17  
Refer
4/26/17  
Engrossed
5/15/17  
Refer
5/26/17  
Refer
5/26/17  
Report Pass
6/13/17  
Report Pass
6/13/17  
Refer
6/13/17  
Report Pass
6/20/17  
Refer
6/20/17  
Report Pass
6/28/17  
Enrolled
9/15/17  
Enrolled
9/15/17  
Chaptered
10/5/17  

Caption

Medical records: access.

Impact

The implications of SB 241 extend to modifying how health care providers in California handle medical record requests. With the amendment of Sections 123105 and 123110 of the Health and Safety Code, the bill facilitates easier access to medical records while incorporating potential penalties for violations. Additionally, the changes allow for greater disclosure of mental health and developmental service records under specific operational circumstances. Such adjustments could significantly impact the way patients and health care providers interact regarding the management of personal medical data.

Summary

Senate Bill 241, introduced by Senator Monning, aims to amend existing laws governing patients' access to their medical records in California. The bill revises the current requirement for health care providers to furnish medical records, shifting the basis of fees charged from clerical costs to a more comprehensive structure that includes labor, supplies, postage, and the preparation of summaries. This change seeks to enhance patient access to their records, making it easier for patients and their representatives to obtain necessary information, particularly when it pertains to appeals for public benefit programs.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding SB 241 have generally been supportive, particularly among patient advocacy groups who view the bill as a positive step towards improving transparency in health care. The sentiment within the legislative assembly indicates a collective understanding of the necessity for amendment in medical record access laws. While there are concerns expressed by some health care providers about the implications of the new fee structure, the overall reception has leaned towards favoring enhanced patient rights and accessibility.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the specifics of fee structures and the definition of what constitutes reasonable costs for accessing medical records. Additionally, opponents argue that the bill could inadvertently increase the administrative burden on health care providers who may need to implement new protocols for handling requests. Concerns regarding the confidential nature of certain medical records, especially mental health documentation, have also been raised, prompting discussions about the balance between access and privacy.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2144

Mental health: information sharing.

CA AB681

Mental health: information sharing.

CA AB1119

Developmental and mental health services: information and records: confidentiality.

CA SB1190

Eugenics Sterilization Compensation Program.

CA AB1007

Forced or Involuntary Sterilization Compensation Program.

CA AB3052

Forced or Involuntary Sterilization Compensation Program.

CA AB1764

Forced or Involuntary Sterilization Compensation Program.

CA AB137

Health omnibus trailer bill.