California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB243

Introduced
2/6/17  
Introduced
2/6/17  
Refer
2/16/17  
Refer
2/16/17  
Report Pass
3/21/17  
Report Pass
3/21/17  
Refer
3/21/17  
Refer
3/21/17  
Engrossed
5/4/17  
Refer
5/11/17  
Refer
5/11/17  
Report Pass
5/18/17  
Report Pass
5/18/17  
Enrolled
5/23/17  
Enrolled
5/23/17  
Chaptered
5/26/17  
Chaptered
5/26/17  
Passed
5/26/17  

Caption

Citrus disease prevention.

Impact

The enactment of SB 243 is significant for state laws regarding agricultural funding and pest management. By allocating a substantial amount of money specifically for citrus disease prevention, the bill reinforces the state's commitment to agricultural health and productivity. The funds will enable the Department of Food and Agriculture to implement effective management strategies and preventive measures against citrus diseases, which could otherwise threaten the state's citrus industry and agricultural revenues.

Summary

Senate Bill 243, introduced by Senator Galgiani, addresses the pressing issue of citrus disease prevention in California. The legislation appropriates $9,616,000 from the Citrus Disease Management Account, which is part of the Department of Food and Agriculture Fund. This funding is earmarked for operating expenses necessary to combat citrus-specific pests, diseases, and their vectors. The bill emphasizes the immediate need for a financial commitment to maintain the health of California's citrus crops, which are vital to the state's agricultural economy.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 243 is largely positive, with bipartisan support reflected in the voting history. The bill passed unanimously in the Senate, indicating that legislators recognize the critical importance of maintaining the health of citrus crops. Stakeholders in the agriculture sector have shown approval, highlighting that the appropriation will improve responses to citrus disease threats, thereby sustaining both the economy and employment in rural areas dependent on agriculture.

Contention

Despite its broad support, some concerns were raised about the allocation of funds and the effectiveness of the proposed measures. Opponents pointed out the need for ongoing oversight and evaluation to ensure that the funds are utilized effectively and lead to tangible results in disease prevention. This reflects a broader issue within agricultural policy regarding the balance between funding and accountability, despite the overarching agreement on the urgency of addressing citrus diseases.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB1861

Pest control: Pierce’s disease.

CA SB1333

Communicable diseases: HIV reporting.

CA AB424

Neurodegenerative disease registry.

CA AB2653

Communicable disease: prevention and control.

CA AB2613

Jacqueline Marie Zbur Rare Disease Advisory Council.

CA SB1099

Newborn screening: genetic diseases: blood samples collected.

CA AB1983

Income taxes: voluntary contributions: Prevention of Animal Homelessness and Cruelty Voluntary Tax Contribution Fund.

CA AB659

Cancer Prevention Act.

CA AB2680

Alzheimer’s disease.

CA SB625

Newborn screening: genetic diseases: blood samples collected.

Similar Bills

CA SB453

California State University Agricultural Research Institute grant program: Agricultural Biosecurity Fund.

HI SB2790

Related To Agriculture.

HI SB2422

Relating To Agriculture.

HI SB2932

Relating To Agriculture.

HI SB2992

Relating To Agriculture.

HI HB1584

Relating To Agriculture.

HI SB2363

Relating To Agriculture.

HI HB2138

Relating To Agricultural Education.