California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB250

Introduced
2/7/17  
Refer
2/16/17  
Refer
2/16/17  
Report Pass
3/21/17  
Report Pass
3/21/17  
Refer
3/22/17  
Refer
3/22/17  
Report Pass
5/25/17  
Report Pass
5/25/17  
Engrossed
5/31/17  
Refer
6/12/17  
Refer
6/12/17  
Report Pass
6/28/17  
Report Pass
6/28/17  
Refer
6/29/17  
Refer
6/29/17  
Report Pass
9/1/17  
Enrolled
9/14/17  
Enrolled
9/14/17  
Chaptered
10/12/17  
Chaptered
10/12/17  

Caption

Pupil meals: Child Hunger Prevention and Fair Treatment Act of 2017.

Impact

This legislation requires local educational agencies, including school districts and charter schools that provide meals through federal programs like the National School Lunch Program, to ensure that no student is denied or given an inferior meal due to their parents' unpaid fees. Furthermore, the bill mandates that schools cannot discipline students in a way that affects their access to meals. These provisions aim to improve access to nutritious food for all students, particularly those from low-income families.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 250, known as the Child Hunger Prevention and Fair Treatment Act of 2017, aims to address the treatment of students in public educational institutions regarding unpaid school meal fees. The bill prohibits local educational agencies from shaming or treating students differently based on the unpaid status of their meal accounts. It emphasizes that all students should receive nutritionally adequate meals irrespective of their family's financial status, thereby promoting equal treatment in schools and discouraging punitive measures against students for their parents' unpaid debts.

Sentiment

The response to SB 250 has generally been positive among advocates for child welfare and educational equity, who view this legislation as a step towards ensuring that all children receive the meals they need without feeling stigmatized. However, there may be concerns from some educational institutions about the financial and administrative burdens of implementing these new requirements, especially related to monitoring unpaid meal fees and notifying parents.

Contention

One notable point of contention could arise around the potential costs associated with reimbursing local educational agencies for expenses mandated by the state due to implementing these new requirements. While the bill specifies provisions for state reimbursement where applicable, concerns remain about the efficiency and adequacy of this financial support, which could impact the operational budgets of these agencies.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB265

Pupil meals: Child Hunger Prevention and Fair Treatment Act of 2017.

CA SB348

Pupil meals.

CA AB354

School meals: free or reduced-price meals.

CA AB842

Child nutrition: school, childcare, and preschool meals.

CA SB711

Taxation: federal conformity.