California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB261

Introduced
2/8/17  
Introduced
2/8/17  
Refer
2/16/17  
Refer
2/16/17  
Refer
4/4/17  
Refer
4/4/17  
Report Pass
4/27/17  
Refer
4/27/17  
Refer
4/27/17  
Engrossed
5/15/17  
Engrossed
5/15/17  
Refer
5/26/17  
Refer
5/26/17  
Report Pass
7/12/17  
Report Pass
7/12/17  
Refer
7/12/17  
Refer
7/12/17  
Report Pass
8/23/17  
Enrolled
8/30/18  
Chaptered
9/27/18  
Chaptered
9/27/18  

Caption

Common interest developments: governance.

Impact

The changes introduced by SB 261 are significant as they modify the required notice period for proposed rule changes from 30 days to just 28 days. This slight reduction aims to streamline the governance process, allowing associations to make necessary rules in a more timely manner without compromising transparency. Additionally, the allowance for electronic consent facilitates quicker adaptations to changing circumstances affecting common interest developments, thus enhancing operational efficiency.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 261, primarily amending Sections 4040 and 4360 of the Civil Code, focuses on enhancing the governance of common interest developments in California under the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act. The bill allows homeowners associations to utilize electronic means for document delivery to members, provided there is written consent. This amendment accommodates the increasing reliance on digital communications while ensuring that associations can more efficiently manage their communications with members.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 261 appears to be largely positive among proponents who see the benefits of modernizing communication methods and reducing bureaucratic delays. Advocates argue that the ability to deliver notices and documents electronically is a step forward in making governance more accessible and responsive to the needs of residents. However, some concerns remain about ensuring that all members are adequately informed and able to participate in governance, particularly those less familiar with digital communications.

Contention

Despite its support, there are discussions surrounding the implications of reduced notice periods and the potential for hastier rule changes without sufficient member engagement. Critics may concern that the electronic delivery of notices could disadvantage those who prefer traditional methods or lack access to technology, leading to unintentional exclusion from important governance processes. Balancing efficiency with adequate member involvement will be crucial for the successful implementation of the bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1128

Common interest developments: governance.

CA SB981

Common interest developments: document delivery.

CA SB392

Common interest developments: document delivery.

CA AB540

Motions: filing and service requirements.

CA SB1239

Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign disclosures.

CA AB690

Common interest developments: managers: conflicts of interest.

CA SB888

Political Reform Act of 1974.