California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB274

Introduced
2/9/17  
Refer
2/23/17  
Report Pass
3/14/17  
Report Pass
3/14/17  
Refer
3/14/17  
Report Pass
4/3/17  
Report Pass
4/3/17  
Engrossed
4/24/17  
Refer
5/22/17  
Refer
5/22/17  
Refer
4/9/18  
Refer
4/9/18  
Refer
4/16/18  
Refer
4/16/18  
Refer
5/30/18  
Refer
5/30/18  
Refer
6/14/18  
Refer
6/14/18  
Report Pass
6/27/18  
Report Pass
6/27/18  
Refer
6/28/18  
Report Pass
8/16/18  
Report Pass
8/16/18  
Refer
8/28/18  
Refer
8/28/18  
Refer
8/28/18  
Refer
8/28/18  
Enrolled
8/31/18  
Chaptered
9/23/18  
Chaptered
9/23/18  
Passed
9/23/18  

Caption

Administration of taxes: notice of deficiency assessment.

Impact

The enactment of SB 274 has significant implications for how partnerships operate within California's tax framework. By mandating timely reporting of changes in federal tax returns, the bill aims to improve compliance and enhance the accuracy of state tax assessments. This shift could reduce instances of discrepancies between federal and state tax obligations, resulting in a more efficient tax administration process. Furthermore, the urgency clause indicates a recognition of the pressing need for these changes to be implemented quickly to relieve the burdens imposed on partnerships navigating complex tax regulations.

Summary

Senate Bill 274, introduced by Senator Glazer, aims to amend specific provisions within the Revenue and Taxation Code regarding how partnerships report changes in federal returns to the Franchise Tax Board (FTB). The bill establishes a requirement for partnerships to report any changes or corrections made by the federal Commissioner of Internal Revenue to income, deductions, or tax items within six months of each federal determination. This streamlined approach is designed to alleviate administrative burdens faced by both taxpayers and tax agencies, ensuring state tax law aligns with recent federal tax law revisions.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB 274 appears to be positive, especially among stakeholders who favor streamlined tax processes. Advocacy groups and tax professionals likely support the bill's intent to unify state and federal reporting requirements, reducing confusion and the potential for tax liabilities arising from delayed or incorrect reporting. However, as with any tax-related legislation, there may be concerns from some quarters regarding the burden on partnerships to comply with tighter reporting timelines, particularly small businesses that may lack the resources required to meet the new obligations swiftly.

Contention

Notably, the bill does not seem to indicate major contention during discussions. However, the implementation of stringent reporting requirements may lead to concerns regarding the potential for increased administrative penalties for partnerships that fail to comply timely. Moreover, the necessity of filing an 'Administrative Adjustment Request' can introduce complexities that some partnerships may struggle to navigate, highlighting a potential area of contention regarding the clarity and feasibility of compliance with these new regulations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB790

Income taxes: partnerships: audit adjustments: elections.

CA SB711

Taxation: federal conformity.

CA SB352

Income taxes: withholding: real property sales.

CA AB1582

Income taxes: withholding: real property sales: Katz-Harris Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights Act: report.

CA AB2529

Income taxation: like kind exchanges: withholding.

CA SB706

Property taxation: change in ownership.

CA SB1319

Property taxation: change in ownership.

CA AB2088

Wealth tax.