California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB302

Introduced
2/13/17  
Refer
2/23/17  
Refer
2/23/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Refer
4/5/17  
Refer
5/4/17  
Refer
5/4/17  
Report Pass
5/10/17  
Report Pass
5/10/17  
Engrossed
5/22/17  
Engrossed
5/22/17  
Refer
6/5/17  
Refer
6/5/17  
Refer
6/19/17  
Refer
6/19/17  
Refer
7/3/17  
Refer
7/3/17  
Report Pass
7/13/17  
Enrolled
9/12/17  
Chaptered
10/14/17  
Chaptered
10/14/17  
Passed
10/14/17  

Caption

Joint powers agencies: Orange County Fire Authority: funds.

Impact

The bill reinforces the existing laws regarding the use of property tax revenues designed for fire protection services. By mandating approval for funding transfers from local agencies, it aims to ensure that fire protection funds are not misallocated or diverted to other uses. This legislative change reflects a commitment to maintaining dedicated funding for fire services within the region, potentially enhancing response capacities and community safety measures in Orange County. Furthermore, the bill addresses specific conditions under which these transfers can occur, promoting careful assessment and community involvement through required public hearings.

Summary

Senate Bill 302, introduced by Senator Mendoza, aims to amend Section 99.02 of the Revenue and Taxation Code concerning joint powers agencies, specifically related to the Orange County Fire Authority. The bill establishes that property tax revenues allocated by the County of Orange to a joint powers authority for fire protection must be utilized strictly for that purpose. Additionally, it requires that any transfer of such property tax revenues between agencies should receive the approval of the county, a majority of the member cities, and the receiving agency to ensure proper fund management and accountability.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 302 appears supportive among local government officials and fire service advocates. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary measure to stabilize funding for fire protection in light of increasing demands on these services. There is a recognition of the need to keep funding transparent and accountable. However, there may be some concerns about bureaucratic hurdles introduced by the requirement for public approval, which could slow down funding transfers needed in emergencies. Overall, the general tone is positive, focusing on the importance of sustaining fire protection resources.

Contention

There were discussions regarding the necessity of the special statute as indicated in the bill's text, recognizing that general statutes were inadequate to address the unique conditions of the Orange County Fire Authority. The contention primarily revolves around the balance between local governance and state regulations, as some stakeholders may view the additional approval requirements as limiting local agencies' agility. However, supporters contend that these measures are essential to safeguard vital resources that directly affect public safety.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB3045

Natural Resources Agency: State Water Project Commission.

CA SB796

State parks: state beaches: County of Los Angeles: Manhattan State Beach: deed restrictions: taxation.

CA ACA7

Property taxation: intercounty base year value transfers.

CA ACA24

Property taxation: transfer of base year value: disaster relief.

CA SCA8

Property taxation: base year value transfers: persons with a severely disabled child.

CA ACA5

Motor vehicle fees and taxes: restriction on expenditures: appropriations limit.

CA ACA12

Property taxation: base year value transfers: persons with a severely disabled child.

CA SCA19

Property taxation: base year value transfers: qualified veterans.