Energy data transparency.
The implications of SB 356 are multi-faceted, intending to support California's ambitious energy goals, including achieving 33% renewable energy generation by 2020 and doubling the efficiency of buildings by 2030. By promoting data transparency, the bill seeks to inform better policy decisions, enhance consumer access to information for managing energy usage effectively, and support innovations in energy technology that could alleviate the need for additional power plants and infrastructure development.
Senate Bill No. 356, introduced by Senator Skinner, aims to enhance energy data transparency in California by mandating that electric corporations provide detailed, accessible information regarding electricity pricing and consumption. The bill directs the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to require electric corporations to publish pricing data on their websites and to update this information within three months of any rate change. Additionally, it establishes protocols for tracking energy consumption utilizing a global unique identifier for buildings, facilitating greater scrutiny and management of energy use across the state.
The sentiment surrounding SB 356 appears predominantly positive among proponents, who view it as a necessary step towards ensuring accountability and improving decision-making within the energy sector. They argue that enhanced data access will empower consumers, reduce costs, and support the integration of renewable energy resources. However, concerns may arise regarding the security of sensitive consumer data and the obligations placed on local publicly owned utilities, which some stakeholders might perceive as burdensome.
Notably, the bill includes provisions for customer consent on data sharing, wherein utilities may not disclose customer consumption data without clear authorization. This aspect may invite debate over the privacy implications of sharing personal energy usage data, alongside discussions on how to effectively balance transparency with consumer protection. The requirement for utilities to disclose detailed operational data may also raise questions regarding compliance costs and the feasibility of implementing these regulations.