California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB402

Introduced
2/15/17  
Introduced
2/15/17  
Refer
2/23/17  
Refer
2/23/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Refer
4/5/17  
Report Pass
5/1/17  
Report Pass
5/1/17  
Refer
5/2/17  
Failed
2/1/18  

Caption

Marine fisheries: state policy.

Impact

If enacted, SB 402 will require state agencies to collaborate more effectively with federal partners and stakeholders, including fishermen and environmental organizations, to achieve common conservation goals. The bill reflects a commitment to sustainable fishery practices and emphasizes the importance of balancing economic interests with conservation efforts. This policy framework aims to ensure that fisheries management not only supports the fishing industry but also prioritizes ecological health and the long-term viability of marine resources.

Summary

Senate Bill 402, introduced by Senator Allen, seeks to establish a comprehensive state policy regarding marine fisheries in California. The bill emphasizes the protection and enhancement of the significant economic, environmental, recreational, aesthetic, and educational values provided by Pacific fisheries. By adding Section 1701 to the Fish and Game Code, SB 402 mandates that all state agencies, including the Department of Fish and Wildlife and the Fish and Game Commission, consider these values when developing policies related to fisheries management. The intention is to integrate fish and wildlife conservation with broader natural resource management efforts.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 402 appears largely supportive within the conservation community, as it engages multiple stakeholders in the decision-making process. Proponents view this bill as a progressive step towards enhancing the state's commitment to its marine resources while ensuring public input in management strategies. However, there may be concerns from those in the fishing industry about potential regulatory burdens, especially if they perceive that increased restrictions could arise from the collaborative efforts mandated by the bill.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB 402 might arise around the balance of state control versus local governance in fisheries management. Critics could argue that increased collaboration might delay critical management decisions necessary for immediate fishery issues, while supporters anticipate that a collaborative approach will lead to more comprehensive solutions. Overall, the debate will likely center on how best to implement this policy while safeguarding the livelihoods that depend on fishing and protecting marine ecosystems.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1407

Coastal resources: ocean recovery and restoration: large-scale restoration: artificial reefs.

CA SB1

Coastal resources: sea level rise.

CA SB1100

Coastal resources: sea level rise.

CA AB3023

Wildfire and Forest Resilience Task Force: interagency funding strategy: multiple benefit projects: grant program guidelines.

CA SB1072

Regional Climate Collaborative Program: technical assistance.

CA SB1314

Community Energy Resilience Act of 2020.

CA AB1252

Environmental Justice Small Grant Program: advance payments.

CA SB436

Wildfire safety: The California Wildfire Mitigation Strategic Planning Act.