California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB441

Introduced
2/15/17  
Refer
2/23/17  
Refer
2/23/17  
Refer
3/21/17  
Refer
3/21/17  
Report Pass
3/29/17  
Report Pass
3/29/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Refer
4/18/17  
Refer
4/18/17  
Report Pass
4/26/17  
Report Pass
4/26/17  
Refer
4/26/17  
Refer
4/26/17  
Failed
2/1/18  

Caption

Alternative payment programs: reimbursement.

Impact

The proposed amendments under SB 441 are expected to provide greater financial support to child care providers, particularly those managing smaller contracts or serving migrant communities. By raising the reimbursement cap, the bill intends to ensure that these programs can maintain higher-quality service through better administrative support and resources. The revisions align with the broader objectives of the Child Care and Development Services Act to maximize parental choice and access to child care services for children up to 13 years of age.

Summary

Senate Bill 441, introduced by Senator Cannella, seeks to amend Section 8223 of the Education Code, specifically affecting the reimbursement structure for alternative payment programs in California. The bill aims to enhance the support for child care providers by increasing the reimbursement limit for administrative and support services from 17.5% to 22% for specific contracts. This change is focused on alternative payment programs that operate with individual contracts totaling less than $3 million and encompasses migrant child care programs regardless of contract size.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB 441 appears to be positive among proponents, who view the bill as a necessary adjustment to support the state’s child care providers. Supporters argue that enhancing reimbursement rates will ultimately benefit families seeking quality child care options. However, there are concerns regarding the sustainability of such increases in funding and whether they can be maintained without affecting other areas of the budget.

Contention

While the sentiment leans toward support, there are notable points of contention regarding the long-term implications of increasing reimbursement limits. Critics may question the funding sources required to sustain these adjustments and whether it leads to a disproportionate allocation of resources to certain regions or programs over others. The debate centers on ensuring equitable access to child care services across California while managing state budget constraints and fiscal responsibilities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1295

Oil and gas: hazardous or deserted wells and facilities: labor standards: expenditure limits: reports.

CA SB128

Public contracts: Best Value Construction Contracting for Counties Pilot Program.

CA AB106

Budget Acts of 2022 and 2023.

CA SB106

Budget Acts of 2022 and 2023.

CA AB880

State government grants and contracts: payment of claims and grantees’ indirect costs.

CA AB933

Food and agriculture omnibus bill.

CA SB793

Competitive bidding: design-build and best value construction contracting.

CA AB2880

Political Reform Act of 1974: local enforcement.