California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB558

Introduced
2/16/17  
Introduced
2/16/17  
Refer
3/2/17  
Report Pass
4/25/17  
Refer
4/26/17  
Engrossed
7/17/17  
Refer
7/20/17  
Report Pass
1/16/18  
Report Pass
1/16/18  
Refer
1/16/18  
Refer
1/16/18  
Refer
1/16/18  
Report Pass
1/18/18  
Report Pass
1/18/18  
Enrolled
1/29/18  
Chaptered
1/31/18  

Caption

Property taxation: new construction exclusion: rain water capture system.

Impact

The bill introduces significant changes to the way property taxes are assessed for properties that incorporate rain water capture systems. By classifying these systems as not newly constructed, local agencies will not be able to levy additional taxes based on these modifications. However, the bill contains stipulations that prevent the state from reimbursing local agencies for property tax revenue losses incurred due to this classification, which has raised concerns about funding and financial impacts on local governments.

Summary

Senate Bill 558, authored by Glazer, focuses on property taxation regulations in California, specifically regarding rain water capture systems. This legislation excludes the construction or addition of such systems from being classified as new construction for property tax purposes until January 1, 2029. The intent is to encourage the installation of rain water capture systems, thereby promoting sustainability and environmental responsibility by alleviating potential tax burdens associated with their installation.

Sentiment

Reactions to SB 558 have largely been positive among environmental advocates and sustainability proponents who see it as a necessary step toward encouraging green building practices. However, there is notable contention from local governments and some policymakers who fear it will lead to budget shortfalls due to the lack of reimbursement for lost tax revenues. The sentiment around the bill indicates a divide between environmental priorities and fiscal responsibilities at the local government level.

Contention

Key points of contention include the financial viability for local governments where this legislation might lead to reduced property tax income without state compensation. Critics argue that while promoting rain water capture systems is environmentally beneficial, the lack of support for local agencies could undermine their ability to maintain services funded by those taxes. Supporters counter that the long-term environmental benefits and potential reductions in water usage offset immediate financial concerns.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1340

Property taxation: active solar energy systems: extension.

CA SB364

Change in ownership: nonresidential active solar energy systems: initiative.

CA AB881

Property taxation: new construction exclusion: methane digester.

CA AB105

Change in ownership: nonresidential active solar energy systems: initiative.

CA SB710

Property taxation: active solar energy systems: extension.

CA SB1059

Property taxation: active solar energy systems: partnership flip transactions.

CA AB1516

Real property taxation.