California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB6

Introduced
12/5/16  
Refer
1/12/17  
Refer
1/24/17  
Report Pass
1/31/17  
Report Pass
1/31/17  
Refer
1/31/17  
Report Pass
2/14/17  
Report Pass
2/14/17  
Refer
2/15/17  
Refer
3/1/17  
Report Pass
3/13/17  
Report Pass
3/13/17  
Engrossed
4/3/17  
Engrossed
4/3/17  
Refer
5/18/17  
Refer
5/18/17  
Refer
9/5/17  
Refer
9/5/17  
Enrolled
9/15/17  
Chaptered
10/3/17  
Chaptered
10/3/17  
Passed
10/3/17  

Caption

Tribal gaming: compact ratification.

Impact

The bill specifically addresses the implications of tribal sovereignty, particularly regarding environmental regulations. It declares that certain actions related to the compact will not be deemed projects under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which typically requires a lead agency to prepare environmental impact reports. This exemption is intended to facilitate the tribe’s successful operation of their gaming activities without the long delays often posed by environmental review processes, thereby aiding in their economic development and self-sufficiency.

Summary

Senate Bill 6, also known as the Tribal Gaming Compact Ratification Act, aims to ratify the gaming compact established between the State of California and the Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation. This compact is significant as it allows for certain types of gaming on tribal lands, which is governed by the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988. By ratifying this compact, the state affirms its commitment to recognizing and supporting the rights and sovereignty of the Quechan Tribe in their gaming enterprise.

Sentiment

The atmosphere surrounding SB 6 appears generally favorable among legislators, as evidenced by its unanimous approval in the voting process, which shows a collective agreement on the importance of supporting Native American tribes and their gaming rights. Legislators expressed support for the bill, viewing it as essential for promoting economic stability for the Quechan Tribe and the surrounding community.

Contention

While the bill received broad support, it also enters a complex field of tribal-state relations and environmental policy. Opponents might argue that exempting certain tribal actions from CEQA could set a precedent for future compact negotiations, potentially limiting local jurisdictions' input on environmental impacts without sufficient oversight. However, the immediate urgency emphasized in the bill seeks to secure rapid economic benefits for the tribe, which significantly underscored the necessity of this legislative action.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB585

Tribal gaming: compact ratification.

CA SB736

Tribal gaming: compact ratification.

CA SB559

Tribal gaming: compact ratification.

CA AB854

Tribal gaming: compact ratification.

CA SB67

Cannabis: marketing: appellations of origin: county, city, or city and county of origin.

CA SB674

Tribal gaming: compact ratification.

CA AB891

Tribal gaming: compact ratification.

CA SB910

Tribal gaming: compact ratification.