California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB639

Introduced
2/17/17  
Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
3/2/17  
Refer
3/2/17  
Refer
3/23/17  
Refer
3/23/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Report Pass
4/19/17  
Report Pass
4/19/17  
Refer
4/19/17  
Engrossed
5/8/17  
Refer
5/26/17  
Report Pass
6/21/17  
Refer
6/21/17  
Report Pass
7/19/17  
Report Pass
7/19/17  
Enrolled
8/24/17  
Chaptered
9/1/17  
Chaptered
9/1/17  
Passed
9/1/17  

Caption

Property taxation: assessment: electric generation facilities.

Impact

The impact of SB 639 is significant, as it adjusts the framework under which electric generation facilities are taxed, thereby potentially increasing tax revenues for local governments. By including previously exempt facilities in property assessments, the bill creates a more uniform taxation structure for electric power producers. Furthermore, the bill provides a mechanism for financial reimbursement, mandating that if the Commission on State Mandates determines any costs are imposed on local agencies due to this assessment, those costs must be reimbursed, protecting local budgets from unexpected financial burdens.

Summary

Senate Bill 639, introduced by Senator Hertzberg, focuses on property taxation and assessment practices for electric generation facilities. Specifically, it amends Section 721.5 of the Revenue and Taxation Code to require county assessors to assess electric generation facilities with a capacity of 50 megawatts or more that are owned by electrical corporations. The bill aims to ensure that certain power generation facilities falling under the category of exempt wholesale generators are assessed for property tax purposes, which were previously exempt from this requirement. This change intends to create fairness in taxation across similar facilities regardless of their power source.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 639 reflects a general consensus on the necessity of fair taxation in the evolving energy landscape. Proponents argue that this bill rectifies previous gaps in the property tax system, ensuring all substantial power producers contribute equitably to local revenues. However, there may be contention regarding how these assessments could affect the cost structures and operations of facilities that historically enjoyed exemptions.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential administrative burden placed on county assessors who will now be responsible for assessing additional facilities under the new guidelines. Some stakeholders might express concern over how this increased regulatory environment could influence the economic viability of electric generation projects, particularly those utilizing alternative energy sources. Additionally, discussions may arise about the appropriateness of state mandates in requiring local entities to adapt their practices without corresponding resources.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB38

Battery energy storage facilities: emergency response and emergency action plans.

CA AB388

Electricity.

CA SB1018

Electricity.

CA SB283

Energy storage systems.

CA AB3107

State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission: microgrids: study.

CA SB1340

Property taxation: active solar energy systems: extension.

CA AB1253

Property taxation: newly constructed property: reconstruction of damaged or destroyed property.

CA AB36

Eligible fuel cell electrical generating facilities: energy metering.