California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB673

Introduced
2/17/17  
Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
3/9/17  
Refer
3/9/17  
Report Pass
4/26/17  
Report Pass
4/26/17  
Refer
4/26/17  
Refer
4/26/17  
Report Pass
5/18/17  
Report Pass
5/18/17  
Engrossed
5/30/17  
Engrossed
5/30/17  
Refer
6/12/17  
Refer
6/12/17  
Report Pass
7/11/17  
Report Pass
7/11/17  
Refer
7/11/17  
Refer
7/11/17  
Refer
8/21/17  
Refer
8/21/17  
Refer
8/24/17  
Refer
8/24/17  
Report Pass
8/30/17  
Report Pass
8/30/17  
Enrolled
9/14/17  
Chaptered
10/14/17  
Chaptered
10/14/17  
Passed
10/14/17  

Caption

Pet Lover’s specialized license plates.

Impact

The enactment of SB 673 will amend the Vehicle Code, particularly Section 5168, by establishing the Pet Lovers Fund within the Specialized License Plate Fund, where all revenues from associated fees are directed. The newly structured grant program will prioritize funding to veterinary facilities located in underserved areas or those demonstrating financial need. This change is expected to facilitate greater access to affordable veterinary services and promote animal welfare initiatives aimed at reducing pet overpopulation.

Summary

Senate Bill 673, authored by Senator Newman, focuses on the administration of the Pet Lovers specialized license plate program, specifically designed to fund no-cost or low-cost animal sterilization services across California. The bill proposes transferring the management of the program from the Veterinary Medical Board to the Department of Food and Agriculture, effectively streamlining the grant disbursement process. This transition aims to rectify administrative issues that previously hindered the use of funds collected from license plate fees for their intended purpose—supporting animal sterilization services.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 673 is predominantly favorable among animal welfare advocates who view it as a progressive move towards enhancing community health and animal care. The shift in administrative oversight is anticipated to improve efficiency in funding distribution. However, some concerns may arise regarding the effectiveness of the Department of Food and Agriculture in handling grants traditionally managed by veterinary professionals, prompting discussions about competency and focus on animal health.

Contention

Potential points of contention include the difference in oversight between the Veterinary Medical Board and the Department of Food and Agriculture, particularly about ensuring that funds are appropriately allocated and utilized for their intended purpose. Those opposing the bill might express concerns over the Department's capability to manage veterinary-related programs sensitively, particularly in understanding the nuances of animal health and community needs. Additionally, restrictions on administrative costs aimed at minimizing overhead could be revisited to ensure sufficient operational flexibility.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB934

Corporate taxes: exempt organizations: filing fees.

CA AB1885

Cannabis and cannabis products: animals: veterinary medicine.

CA AB240

Dogs and cats: California Spay-Neuter Fund.

NJ A725

Establishes veterinary medicine loan redemption program for certain veterinarians who work in underserved areas for five years; annually appropriates $500,000.

CA AB384

Cannabis and cannabis products: animals: veterinary medicine.

CA AB1282

Veterinary medicine: blood banks for animals.

CA AB2265

Animals: euthanasia.