California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB71

Introduced
1/9/17  
Introduced
1/9/17  
Refer
1/19/17  
Refer
1/19/17  
Refer
3/1/17  
Refer
3/1/17  
Refer
3/8/17  
Report Pass
4/17/17  
Refer
4/18/17  
Refer
4/18/17  
Refer
5/2/17  
Refer
5/2/17  
Report Pass
5/15/17  
Refer
5/16/17  
Report Pass
5/25/17  
Report Pass
5/25/17  
Engrossed
5/31/17  
Refer
6/12/17  
Refer
6/12/17  
Refer
2/26/18  
Refer
2/26/18  
Refer
4/5/18  
Refer
4/5/18  
Refer
4/18/18  
Refer
4/18/18  
Refer
8/7/18  

Caption

Solid waste: disposal.

Impact

The bill expands the civil enforcement mechanisms relating to the unauthorized removal of recyclable materials, which had previously only been subject to limited penalties. The introduction of treble damages and a clearer pathway for local agencies to pursue enforcement actions is expected to strengthen the state's efforts in waste management and recycling compliance. By requiring local agencies to take proactive measures, the bill places additional responsibilities on these entities to monitor and act against violations, potentially leading to more effective waste management practices.

Summary

Senate Bill 71, introduced by Senator Wiener, amends sections of the Public Resources Code related to solid waste management and disposal. The bill aims to enhance enforcement against unauthorized removal of segregated recyclable materials and allows local governmental agencies to initiate civil actions against violators. It mandates that courts award reasonable attorney fees and costs to prevailing parties, although it restricts these awards in certain circumstances. This legislation seeks to bolster compliance with recycling mandates by promoting accountability among waste handlers.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 71 is mixed, with proponents advocating for increased protections for recycling efforts and better enforcement against those who undermine these laws. Supporters believe that the bill is a significant step forward in enhancing California's recycling efforts. Conversely, critics express concerns over the potential burden it may place on local agencies and the complexities involved with increased litigation arising from the enforcement actions authorized by the bill.

Contention

A notable point of contention regarding SB 71 revolves around the implications of expanded enforcement powers. Some local governments fear that the bill may lead to overreach or unintended consequences, such as excessive litigation against citizens and small businesses. Additionally, there are concerns about how the new requirements for local agencies to report and manage these actions may stretch their already limited resources. The balance between ensuring compliance and supporting local governance remains a topic of significant debate.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1547

State finance: financing authorities.

CA AB102

Retirement savings.

CA AB511

Securities transactions: qualification requirements, exemptions, and liability.

CA AB1574

Public contracts: small business liaisons and advocates and disabled veteran business enterprises: preferences.

CA AB1677

Gambling: Internet poker.

CA AB1147

Solid waste: disposal.

CA SB810

Retirement savings.

CA AB2527

Securities transactions: qualification requirements, exemptions, and liability.