California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB764

Introduced
2/17/17  
Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
3/9/17  
Refer
3/9/17  
Report Pass
4/20/17  
Report Pass
4/20/17  
Refer
4/24/17  
Refer
4/24/17  
Refer
4/25/17  
Refer
4/25/17  
Engrossed
5/15/17  
Engrossed
5/15/17  
Refer
6/5/17  
Refer
6/5/17  
Report Pass
6/27/17  
Refer
6/27/17  
Refer
6/27/17  
Report Pass
7/19/17  
Enrolled
8/24/17  
Enrolled
8/24/17  
Chaptered
9/11/17  
Chaptered
9/11/17  

Caption

Real estate trust fund accounts: fidelity insurance.

Impact

The bill modifies existing legal requirements related to trust funds, enhancing the protections implemented for brokers and their clients. Under the current law, only licensed individuals could withdraw trust funds unless specific insurance coverage was in place. SB 764 expands this to include unlicensed employees, so long as proper safeguards are observable. This change can enable brokers to manage their operations more flexibly, accommodating staffing needs while minimizing the risk of financial malfeasance.

Summary

Senate Bill 764, authored by Senator Moorlach, aims to amend Section 10145 of the Business and Professions Code concerning real estate brokers and the management of trust fund accounts. The bill allows unlicensed employees of real estate brokers to withdraw funds from the broker's trust fund account, provided that the broker has adequate fidelity insurance coverage or fidelity bond protection. This change emphasizes safeguarding against potential employee misconduct, such as theft or dishonesty, thus establishing a more robust regulatory framework within California's real estate sector.

Sentiment

The legislative sentiment around SB 764 appears to lean toward facilitating operational capability for real estate businesses. Proponents likely welcome the bill as a practical adjustment that reflects the realities of modern real estate transactions, where non-licensed staff often play key roles. However, there could be concerns regarding regulatory oversight and potential abuse of trust funds, which could elicit opposition from some stakeholders in the industry who favor stricter controls.

Contention

Notable points of contention around SB 764 may arise from the implications it has for trust fund integrity and broker accountability. Critics may argue that increasing the number of individuals authorized to handle trust funds—especially unlicensed employees—dilutes the protections currently in place and exposes clients' funds to greater risks. This contrast highlights the balance lawmakers must strike between operational flexibility and safeguarding consumer interests.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1498

Financial institutions: Department of Financial Protection and Innovation: money transmissions.

CA SB363

Financial transactions: corporate entities, securities, loans, and deposits.

CA SB251

Financial institutions.

CT SB00067

An Act Concerning Revisions To The Banking Statutes.

CT HB06339

An Act Concerning Banks, Loan Production Offices, Exchange Facilitators, Public Deposits And Real Property Tax Liens.

CT SB00826

An Act Concerning The Strengthening Of Consumer Credit License Protections.

CT HB05268

An Act Concerning Consumer Credit Licenses.

MS HB1044

Mississippi Bullion Depository; establish.