California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB779

Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
3/9/17  
Refer
9/8/17  
Refer
1/3/18  

Caption

Bail: surety insurers.

Impact

The legislation significantly impacts existing regulations governing bail, aiming to address the perceived deficiencies in the current system. By establishing compliance requirements and accountability measures for surety insurers, SB 779 seeks to mitigate risks associated with the commercial money bail system, which has been criticized for prioritizing profits and failing to enhance public safety. The requirement for escrow accounts for forfeited bail bonds is intended to prevent financial exploitation of individuals unable to post bail, thereby protecting vulnerable populations in California.

Summary

Senate Bill 779, introduced by Senator Hertzberg, seeks to amend regulations concerning bail and surety insurers in California. The bill mandates that all surety insurers must establish compliance units staffed to ensure that bail agents adhere to California's laws. It also compels these insurers to pay all forfeited bail bonds into escrow during appeals, as well as to provide an annual report to the Department of Insurance detailing their operations and confirming compliance among covered bail licensees. Additionally, contracts must clearly disclose the name of the insurer and a contact for complaint procedures, promoting transparency in the bail process.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 779 appears to be mixed but leans towards favoring reform. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step towards ensuring fair treatment in the bail process, emphasizing the need to reduce the coercive effects of the money bail system that disproportionally impacts low-income individuals. Critics, however, may view the bill as an incremental change that does not fully address the systemic issues within the bail industry, indicating a desire for more comprehensive bail reform.

Contention

A notable point of contention is whether the measures outlined in SB 779 effectively tackle the broader issues of pretrial detention and the financial burdens placed on defendants. Some advocates for reform argue that while the bill improves certain regulatory aspects, it still fails to abolish the commercial money bail system, which relies heavily on individuals' wealth to secure pretrial release. Debates surrounding these issues reveal deeply rooted concerns about justice access and equity within California's criminal justice system.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB898

Bail: surety insurers.

CA AB42

Bail: pretrial release.

CA SB10

Pretrial release or detention: pretrial services.

CA SB36

Pretrial release: risk assessment tools.

CA AB3364

Judiciary omnibus.

CA AB2418

Crimes: Justice Data Accountability and Transparency Act.

CA AB208

Deferred entry of judgment: pretrial diversion.

CA AB3192

LEA Medi-Cal billing option: program guide.