California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB80

Introduced
1/11/17  
Refer
1/19/17  
Refer
2/14/17  
Refer
2/14/17  
Report Pass
3/29/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Report Pass
4/17/17  
Report Pass
4/17/17  
Engrossed
4/24/17  
Engrossed
4/24/17  
Refer
5/18/17  
Refer
5/18/17  
Report Pass
6/20/17  
Report Pass
6/20/17  
Refer
6/21/17  
Refer
6/21/17  
Report Pass
7/19/17  
Enrolled
9/11/17  
Enrolled
9/11/17  
Vetoed
10/15/17  

Caption

California Environmental Quality Act: notices.

Impact

The passage of SB 80 is expected to have significant implications for local agencies in California. By requiring postings on local websites and allowing for electronic notifications, the bill seeks to increase public participation in the environmental review process. However, it will also place additional responsibilities on local agencies, technically constituting a state-mandated local program, which could lead to increased operational costs for those agencies. The bill specifies that no state reimbursement is required, implying that local agencies will need to absorb these costs, which could be a point of contention.

Summary

Senate Bill 80, introduced by Senator Wieckowski, aims to amend several sections of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) concerning the requirements for notifying the public about environmental impact reports and negative declarations. The bill mandates that lead agencies not only mail notices to individuals who request them but also post these notices on the agency's website and offer email notifications to enhance public engagement and accessibility. This legislation reflects an effort to improve communication regarding projects that may impact the environment and to streamline the notice process for projects that might be exempt from CEQA requirements.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 80 appears to be generally positive among proponents who advocate for greater transparency and public involvement in environmental decision-making. Supporters argue that easier access to notifications will allow communities to be more informed and engaged regarding potential environmental impacts of local projects. However, there are concerns expressed regarding the increased burden on local agencies to implement these requirements without additional funding, which may lead to criticisms from those wary of unfunded mandates.

Contention

A notable point of contention is the lack of reimbursement for the added responsibilities placed on local agencies by this bill. Critics suggest that while enhancing public notifications is beneficial, the requirement could lead to greater financial strain on smaller local agencies lacking sufficient resources. Furthermore, the potential increase in public inquiries and participation could overwhelm existing processes, leading to delays in project approvals. The bill exemplifies the ongoing debate between promoting public engagement and managing the logistical and fiscal challenges for local governance.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB819

California Environmental Quality Act: notices and documents: electronic filing and posting.

CA AB609

California Environmental Quality Act: notices and documents: electronic filing and posting.

CA AB3023

California Environmental Quality Act.

CA SB69

California Environmental Quality Act: local agencies: filing of notices of determination or exemption.

CA AB1117

California Environmental Quality Act.

CA SB607

California Environmental Quality Act:Infrastructure Projects.

CA SB182

Local government: planning and zoning: wildfires.

CA AB2113

Pesticides.