California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB838

Introduced
1/9/18  
Refer
1/16/18  
Refer
1/16/18  
Refer
3/22/18  
Refer
3/22/18  
Refer
4/4/18  
Refer
4/10/18  
Refer
4/10/18  
Report Pass
4/19/18  
Report Pass
4/19/18  
Refer
4/19/18  
Refer
4/25/18  
Report Pass
5/9/18  
Report Pass
5/9/18  
Engrossed
5/17/18  
Engrossed
5/17/18  
Refer
5/31/18  
Refer
5/31/18  
Refer
6/14/18  
Refer
6/14/18  
Report Pass
6/19/18  
Report Pass
6/19/18  
Refer
6/19/18  
Refer
6/19/18  
Report Pass
7/5/18  
Report Pass
7/5/18  
Enrolled
8/31/18  
Enrolled
8/31/18  
Chaptered
9/28/18  
Chaptered
9/28/18  

Caption

Corporate records: articles of incorporation: blockchain technology.

Impact

The bill amends Sections 204 and 2603 of the Corporations Code and introduces significant changes to how corporate records can be maintained. By incorporating blockchain technology, it offers a method to create tamper-proof records that are publicly accessible and secure. The legal endorsement of blockchain for record-keeping is intended to build trust amongst shareholders and provide clarity regarding corporate governance. This legislative change marks a step toward aligning California's corporate laws with advancements in technology.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 838, introduced by Senator Hertzberg, aims to modernize the regulations surrounding corporate records and articles of incorporation in California. Specifically, it allows corporations and social purpose corporations without outstanding securities listed on certain exchanges to maintain their records—such as shareholder names, addresses, and share transfers—on a blockchain. This technological adoption is projected to enhance the transparency and efficiency of corporate record-keeping, ultimately aiming to streamline the processes associated with company incorporations and operations.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB 838 appears to be favorable among proponents of innovation in the business sector, who view the introduction of blockchain as a progressive update to existing laws. Supporters argue that it will increase operational efficiencies for corporations and enhance shareholder engagement through improved accessibility to records. However, there may be concerns surrounding the implementation of such technology and the potential for misuse if adequate safeguards are not in place.

Contention

While there is considerable support for the bill, points of contention could arise regarding the technical complexities and security measures required to utilize blockchain technology effectively. Issues may also emerge about the implications for privacy and data security as shareholder information shifts to a decentralized ledger. Additionally, critics might question whether this technological transformation truly addresses the challenges corporations face in governance and shareholder rights, or if it merely complicates the existing regulatory framework.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB638

Employment: personal social media of applicant or employee.

WV HB4010

Relating to digital assets and recognizing virtual currency

WV SB504

Providing statutory framework for treatment of digital assets

CT SB00967

An Act Concerning Revisions To The Connecticut Business Corporation Act, The Uniform Limited Partnership Act And The Connecticut Limited Liability Company Act.

CT SB00411

An Act Concerning Revisions To The Connecticut Business Corporation Act.

OK SB620

Professional Entity Act; modifying requirements for persons holding interest in domestic professional entity; prohibiting certain persons from holding shares in certain professional corporations. Effective date.

LA HB408

Revises the business corporation laws (RE1 INCREASE SG EX See Note)

LA HB319

Provides for revisions to business corporation law