California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB936

Introduced
1/25/18  
Refer
2/8/18  
Refer
2/8/18  
Refer
3/21/18  
Refer
3/21/18  
Refer
4/2/18  
Refer
4/2/18  
Refer
4/4/18  
Refer
4/4/18  
Refer
4/16/18  
Refer
4/16/18  
Report Pass
4/25/18  
Report Pass
4/25/18  

Caption

Office of Planning and Research: Automated Vehicles Smart Planning Task Force.

Impact

The bill acknowledges California's role as a tech innovation leader and emphasizes the significant potential of automated vehicle technology in improving environmental and social outcomes. However, it also warns of possible negative impacts, such as increased traffic congestion and greenhouse gas emissions, if the technology is not implemented with careful planning. The task force's recommendations will be crucial for mitigating these risks while leveraging the benefits of automation for California's transportation framework.

Summary

Senate Bill 936, introduced by Senator Allen, establishes an Automated Vehicles Smart Planning Task Force aimed at the strategic deployment of automated light-duty vehicles in California. This bill mandates the Office of Planning and Research to convene a task force that includes representatives from local governments, academic institutions, transportation firms, and environmental organizations. This diverse group is expected to develop recommendations by January 1, 2021, to ensure that automated vehicle deployment aligns with California's environmental and transportation objectives, such as reducing traffic congestion and greenhouse gas emissions, enhancing public transport, and promoting social equity.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 936 is generally supportive of advancing innovative technologies while ensuring they contribute positively to state goals. Stakeholders in tech and sustainability advocate for the bill, citing the need for guidelines that foster responsible automation. Conversely, there are concerns regarding the actual implementation and whether the recommendations could genuinely influence a positive transformation across transport and community design. There’s a shared hope for the potential of this technology to address pressing urban challenges while maintaining environmental standards.

Contention

Key points of contention arise from the predicted shifts in land use and mobility patterns. Critics emphasize the need for a balanced approach that does not prioritize technology over community-specific needs. One core issue is ensuring that automated vehicles do not exacerbate traffic and sprawl, potentially overwhelming cities with increased vehicle miles traveled. The legislative committee discussions indicate a cautionary stance focusing on integrating these vehicles into a broader framework of sustainable urban planning and active transportation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB59

California Transportation Commission: advisory committee: autonomous vehicle technology.

CA AB285

California Transportation Plan.

CA AB2878

Forest Biomass Waste Utilization Program.

CA SB66

California Council on the Future of Transportation: advisory committee: autonomous vehicle technology.

CA SB1075

Hydrogen: green hydrogen: emissions of greenhouse gases.

CA SB493

Air pollution: alternative vehicles and electric and hydrogen infrastructure.

CA SB1374

State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission: Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program: assessments and forecasts: integrated energy policy report.

CA AB753

Tribal gaming: compact ratification.