California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB942

Introduced
1/29/18  
Introduced
1/29/18  
Refer
2/8/18  
Refer
5/16/18  
Refer
5/16/18  
Engrossed
5/29/18  
Engrossed
5/29/18  
Refer
6/4/18  
Refer
6/4/18  
Report Pass
6/27/18  
Enrolled
7/5/18  
Chaptered
7/16/18  
Chaptered
7/16/18  
Passed
7/16/18  

Caption

State claims.

Impact

The impact of SB 942 on state laws is largely procedural, specifically relating to how claims are managed within state agencies. By appropriating specified funds and enabling the immediate payment of these claims, the bill seeks to mitigate delays that could lead to financial hardship for claimants. The necessity of this legislation underscores the importance of timely legislative approval for claims that have been previously approved but lacked funding.

Summary

Senate Bill 942, introduced by Senator Lara, addresses the processing of state claims by making an appropriation of $8,383.98 to the Department of General Services. This bill aims to expedite the payment of claims accepted by the Department, particularly in instances where there are no available appropriations to cover these claims. The bill is declared an urgency statute, which means it will take effect immediately upon passage and enactment, aligning with the state's requirement to handle claims against it efficiently.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 942 appears to be generally supportive among legislators, as immediate payment and resolution of claims against the state are typically viewed favorably. There were no recorded objections noted in the voting history, indicating a consensus on the importance of facilitating swift claim processing. With a vote of 69-0 in favor, it suggests broad bipartisan support for the bill's intent and necessity.

Contention

While there seems to be consensus on the importance of the bill, the main contention may arise from the urgency mechanism itself, which bypasses potential debates that could occur during regular legislative procedures. Urgency statutes can sometimes raise concerns about adequate scrutiny and public input, although, in this instance, the necessity to resolve financial claims and prevent claimant hardship was deemed sufficient justification.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB76

Education finance: constitutional minimum funding obligation: inflation and cost-of-living adjustments.

CA AB76

Education finance: apportionments.

CA ACA9

Budget bill: passage requirements.

CA AB1492

State claims.

CA SB729

Meal and rest breaks: remote work.

CA AB1831

State claims.

CA AB347

Preschool: privately funded pilot program: tax credits.

CA AB1109

Preschool: privately funded pilot program: tax credits.