California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SR39 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.

Old	New	Differences
1	1	CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20172018 REGULAR SESSION Senate Resolution No. 39Introduced by Senators Morrell, Anderson, Bates, Cannella, Fuller, Gaines, Moorlach, Nguyen, Nielsen, Vidak, and WilkMay 08, 2017 Relative to the 39th anniversary of Proposition 13. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTSR 39, as introduced, Morrell. Digest KeyBill TextWHEREAS, On June 6, 1978, Proposition 13, officially titled the Peoples Initiative to Limit Property Taxation, was overwhelmingly approved by Californias voters, reducing property tax rates on homes, businesses, and farms, and capping the rate of increase in the future; andWHEREAS, Home and business ownership are a bedrock of the American dream; andWHEREAS, Proposition 13 makes it easier for all people, regardless of life circumstances, to achieve this dream; andWHEREAS, Prior to the adoption of Proposition 13, Californias raging inflation had sent property tax bills in California soaring so high that many families had to sell their homes because they could not afford to pay their taxes; andWHEREAS, Prior to the adoption of Proposition 13, small business owners facing fast increasing property taxes were forced to lay off their employees or close their businesses if property tax increases made their businesses unprofitable; andWHEREAS, Prior to the adoption of Proposition 13, renters saw their rents increase when landlords saw their property taxes increase at a rapid rate; andWHEREAS, With the passage of Proposition 13, taxpayers, for the first time, were provided a measure of certainty with respect to their property taxes; andWHEREAS, In the 10 years following the passage of Proposition 13, incomes in California grew 50 percent faster than in the nation as a whole, and jobs grew at twice the national average; andWHEREAS, Following the passage of Proposition 13, Californias budget climbed from $55 billion in 1980 to $97 billion in 1992a 75-percent increase above inflation; andWHEREAS, In the 38 years following the passage of Proposition 13, the average homeowner and the average small business have saved tens of thousands of dollars annually in property tax payments, money that was put back into the economy to create jobs and foster economic development; andWHEREAS, Since the passage of Proposition 13, proposed alternatives to Proposition 13 would have had a variety of unwelcome effects, including substantial tax increases for low-income and elderly homeowners; andWHEREAS, Increased property taxes would be a disincentive for first-time homebuyers and stand as a barrier to growth of our housing market; andWHEREAS, Proposition 13 remains just as popular with voters today as it was when it was approved, with numerous recent surveys citing over 60 percent support; andWHEREAS, Proposed alternatives to Proposition 13 that would increase property taxes on California businesses would also affect the ability of employers to hire or retain California employees; andWHEREAS, Proposed alternatives to Proposition 13 would also negatively affect renters who would see their rents increased if their landlords experienced property tax increases; andWHEREAS, Since the passage of Proposition 13, voters have rejected, by wide margins, changes that would have businesses pay property taxes at a higher rate than those imposed upon residential owners, as evidenced by the defeat of Proposition 167 in 1992; andWHEREAS, The volatility of income and sales tax revenue to the state and local governments is a major flaw in Californias tax system; however, Proposition 13 has rendered Californias property taxes a stable and predictable source of public revenue even during economic downturns and has provided a major benefit to local governments in California; andWHEREAS, Friday, June 6, 2017, marks the 39th year following the voters approval of Proposition 13; now, therefore, be itResolved by the Senate of the State of California, That the Senate, in recognition of the impact Proposition 13 has had on the State of California, formally commemorates June 6, 2017, as the 39th anniversary date of Proposition 13; and be it furtherResolved, That the Senate reaffirms its support for Proposition 13 and the benefit that it provides to individual homeowners and to the states overall economy; and be it furtherResolved, That the Secretary of the Senate transmit copies of this resolution to the Governor of the State of California, and to the author for appropriate distribution.
2	2
3	3	CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20172018 REGULAR SESSION Senate Resolution No. 39Introduced by Senators Morrell, Anderson, Bates, Cannella, Fuller, Gaines, Moorlach, Nguyen, Nielsen, Vidak, and WilkMay 08, 2017 Relative to the 39th anniversary of Proposition 13. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTSR 39, as introduced, Morrell. Digest Key
4	4
5	5
6	6
7	7
8	8
9	9	CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20172018 REGULAR SESSION
10	10
11	11	Senate Resolution No. 39
12	12
13	13	Introduced by Senators Morrell, Anderson, Bates, Cannella, Fuller, Gaines, Moorlach, Nguyen, Nielsen, Vidak, and WilkMay 08, 2017
14	14
15	15	Introduced by Senators Morrell, Anderson, Bates, Cannella, Fuller, Gaines, Moorlach, Nguyen, Nielsen, Vidak, and Wilk
16	16	May 08, 2017
17	17
18	18	Relative to the 39th anniversary of Proposition 13.
19	19
20	20	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
21	21
22	22	## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
23	23
24	24	SR 39, as introduced, Morrell.
25	25
26	26
27	27
28	28	## Digest Key
29	29
30	30	## Bill Text
31	31
32	32	WHEREAS, On June 6, 1978, Proposition 13, officially titled the Peoples Initiative to Limit Property Taxation, was overwhelmingly approved by Californias voters, reducing property tax rates on homes, businesses, and farms, and capping the rate of increase in the future; and
33	33
34	34	WHEREAS, Home and business ownership are a bedrock of the American dream; and
35	35
36	36	WHEREAS, Proposition 13 makes it easier for all people, regardless of life circumstances, to achieve this dream; and
37	37
38	38	WHEREAS, Prior to the adoption of Proposition 13, Californias raging inflation had sent property tax bills in California soaring so high that many families had to sell their homes because they could not afford to pay their taxes; and
39	39
40	40	WHEREAS, Prior to the adoption of Proposition 13, small business owners facing fast increasing property taxes were forced to lay off their employees or close their businesses if property tax increases made their businesses unprofitable; and
41	41
42	42	WHEREAS, Prior to the adoption of Proposition 13, renters saw their rents increase when landlords saw their property taxes increase at a rapid rate; and
43	43
44	44	WHEREAS, With the passage of Proposition 13, taxpayers, for the first time, were provided a measure of certainty with respect to their property taxes; and
45	45
46	46	WHEREAS, In the 10 years following the passage of Proposition 13, incomes in California grew 50 percent faster than in the nation as a whole, and jobs grew at twice the national average; and
47	47
48	48	WHEREAS, Following the passage of Proposition 13, Californias budget climbed from $55 billion in 1980 to $97 billion in 1992a 75-percent increase above inflation; and
49	49
50	50	WHEREAS, In the 38 years following the passage of Proposition 13, the average homeowner and the average small business have saved tens of thousands of dollars annually in property tax payments, money that was put back into the economy to create jobs and foster economic development; and
51	51
52	52	WHEREAS, Since the passage of Proposition 13, proposed alternatives to Proposition 13 would have had a variety of unwelcome effects, including substantial tax increases for low-income and elderly homeowners; and
53	53
54	54	WHEREAS, Increased property taxes would be a disincentive for first-time homebuyers and stand as a barrier to growth of our housing market; and
55	55
56	56	WHEREAS, Proposition 13 remains just as popular with voters today as it was when it was approved, with numerous recent surveys citing over 60 percent support; and
57	57
58	58	WHEREAS, Proposed alternatives to Proposition 13 that would increase property taxes on California businesses would also affect the ability of employers to hire or retain California employees; and
59	59
60	60	WHEREAS, Proposed alternatives to Proposition 13 would also negatively affect renters who would see their rents increased if their landlords experienced property tax increases; and
61	61
62	62	WHEREAS, Since the passage of Proposition 13, voters have rejected, by wide margins, changes that would have businesses pay property taxes at a higher rate than those imposed upon residential owners, as evidenced by the defeat of Proposition 167 in 1992; and
63	63
64	64	WHEREAS, The volatility of income and sales tax revenue to the state and local governments is a major flaw in Californias tax system; however, Proposition 13 has rendered Californias property taxes a stable and predictable source of public revenue even during economic downturns and has provided a major benefit to local governments in California; and
65	65
66	66	WHEREAS, Friday, June 6, 2017, marks the 39th year following the voters approval of Proposition 13; now, therefore, be it
67	67
68	68	Resolved by the Senate of the State of California, That the Senate, in recognition of the impact Proposition 13 has had on the State of California, formally commemorates June 6, 2017, as the 39th anniversary date of Proposition 13; and be it further
69	69
70	70	Resolved, That the Senate reaffirms its support for Proposition 13 and the benefit that it provides to individual homeowners and to the states overall economy; and be it further
71	71
72	72	Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate transmit copies of this resolution to the Governor of the State of California, and to the author for appropriate distribution.