Relative to Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly
The resolution underscores the role of PACE in the integration of care services that include not only medical treatments covered by Medicare and Medicaid but also additional support to enhance the participants’ overall well-being and independence. The establishment of PACE programs is meant to address the needs of elderly populations, potentially influencing state health policy direction and funding requirements to better support these initiatives. Recognizing PACE month is intended to draw public attention to California’s commitment to elderly care and the existing infrastructure that supports these programs.
Senate Resolution No. 65, introduced by Senator Mitchell, recognizes September 2017 as Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) month. This resolution emphasizes the importance of PACE programs in providing comprehensive and coordinated care for frail elderly individuals and disabled adults aged 55 and older. As the population of older adults grows, the financial impact of healthcare costs on this demographic gains significance, leading to a necessity for effective care models like PACE. These programs allow eligible individuals to live independently while receiving essential medical and supportive services.
The sentiment around SR65 is predominantly positive, as it highlights a proactive approach to caring for elderly individuals, validating the importance of integrated care systems. Supporters appreciate the acknowledgment of PACE, as it reflects a commitment to enhancing quality of life for the elderly through coordinated healthcare and support services. There seems to be a collective agreement on the necessity of such programs amidst rising healthcare costs for aging populations.
While the resolution itself does not involve legislative controversy, it sets the stage for discussions on funding, availability of services, and the sustainability of PACE programs in the long term. A potential point of contention could arise around the adequacy of support for these programs in the face of growing demand, as well as the allocation of state resources toward expanding PACE initiatives. The appreciation of PACE's role might provoke dialogue regarding how to ensure these programs maintain quality and accessibility across different areas, especially in underserved regions.