California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SR69 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.

Old	New	Differences
1	1	CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20172018 REGULAR SESSION Senate Resolution No. 69Introduced by Senator VidakJanuary 03, 2018 Relative to the expulsion of Senator Tony Mendoza. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTSR 69, as introduced, Vidak. Digest KeyBill TextWHEREAS, On November 10, 2017, reports began appearing in the media about three former female staff members of Senator Tony Mendoza who complained about him sexually harassing them; andWHEREAS, One woman, Jennifer Kwart, was 19 years of age in 2008 when she worked as an intern in then-Assembly Member Mendozas Norwalk District Office; andWHEREAS, Ms. Kwart reported that in 2008, then-Assembly Member Mendoza arranged for her to fly to San Jose during the 2008 California Democratic Convention, picked her up from the airport, and took her to a hotel suite, where, at his suggestion, they had drinks from the minibar; andWHEREAS, The Sacramento Bee has reported that then-Assembly Member Mendozas campaign finance reports from 2008 verify charges of $409 and $703.20 at the Fairmont Hotel in San Jose for candidate travel, lodging, or meals and a $134.50 payment to Southwest Airlines for spouse or staff travel, lodging, or meals; andWHEREAS, Ms. Kwart reported that in the hotel room then-Assembly Member Mendoza began asking her personal questions about her ex-boyfriends and her taste in men; andWHEREAS, Ms. Kwart reported that she believed that then-Assembly Member Mendoza implied that he wanted to have sex with her; andWHEREAS, Ms. Kwart reported, Then and now, I feel like I was very trapped. I was in a place that I had never been to before. I didnt have a car and I didnt have a way out; andWHEREAS, Ms. Kwart reported that she pretended to receive a telephone call in order to excuse herself. She secretly called her mother and asked her to book a flight home for her immediately. She told then-Assembly Member Mendoza that her grandfather had suffered a stroke and that she needed to return to Los Angeles; andWHEREAS, The Sacramento Bee has reported that Ms. Kwarts mother recalls advising her daughter on how to safely navigate the situation via texts and phone calls; andWHEREAS, A second woman, Haley Myers, who worked for then-Assembly Member Mendoza in 2010, reported that then-Assembly Member Mendoza repeatedly sent her text messages, some late at night, with comments such as thinking of you and ending with a smiley face. He singled out Ms. Myers, who was then 30 years of age and married, to attend after-hours events with him, including several occasions in which she found herself alone with Mr. Mendoza over drinks or dinner; andWHEREAS, The Sacramento Bee has reported that, in September 2010, then-Assembly Member Mendoza invited Ms. Myers to join him for a long weekend at a conference in Pebble Beach. Ms. Myers was suspicious and asked for details about the work that would be expected from her on the trip. In response, then-Assembly Member Mendoza said that the accommodations were nice and described the resort town as beautiful. Ms. Myers declined the invitation and mentioned that she and her husband were celebrating their anniversary; andWHEREAS, Ms. Myers reported then-Assembly Member Mendozas behavior to Rene Bayardo, his Legislative Director, who then reported the matter to the Assembly Committee on Rules; andWHEREAS, Mr. Bayardo stated to the Sacramento Bee, The behavior Haley described to me was alarming, and as a supervisor I had a legal and ethical obligation to report it; andWHEREAS, An Assembly Committee on Rules staff member agreed to tell then-Assembly Member Mendoza not to contact Ms. Myers in a non-professional manner and not to retaliate against either Ms. Myers or Mr. Bayardo; andWHEREAS, An Assembly Committee on Rules staff member followed up with Ms. Myers afterward, who reported that then-Assembly Member Mendoza was perplexed and confused; andWHEREAS, A third woman, a 23-year-old Senate Fellow assigned to Senator Mendozas capitol office, was, during the summer of 2017, repeatedly invited by Senator Mendoza to visit him at night in a home he then shared with Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Len, on the pretext of reviewing her rsum; andWHEREAS, Two Senate staff members who reported Senator Mendozas inappropriate behavior to the Senate Committee on Rules were recently fired; andWHEREAS, The director of the California Senate Fellows program at the time who allegedly did not report Senator Mendozas behavior has been put on indefinite leave by Sacramento State University; andWHEREAS, Senator Mendozas responses and statements about the reports of the three women have been vague nondenials attempting to place blame on so-called misunderstandings, miscommunications, and the media seeking to generate advertising sales; andWHEREAS, When a Sacramento Bee reporter asked Senator Mendoza whether he told a Senate Fellow assigned to his office that she could come back to his house to go over her rsum, Senator Mendoza responded, Generally speaking, I would offer assistance to any of our employees seeking higher-ranking positions in ours or other offices; andWHEREAS, Senator Mendoza has clearly violated at least 10 of the Senate Standards of Conduct, which read as follows:FirstEach Senator shall conduct himself or herself so as to justify the high trust reposed in him or her by the people and to promote public confidence in the integrity of the Senate.SecondA Senator or officer or employee of the Senate shall not engage in unethical conduct or tolerate such conduct by others. ...Third... A Senator shall not use the prestige of his or her office, and an officer or employee of the Senate shall not use the status of his or her position, for material or financial gain or private benefit.Fourth... Each Senator shall fairly characterize the issues confronting the Legislature and accurately inform the public regarding the conduct of his or her office.FifthEach Senator and each officer or employee of the Senate has an obligation to the public and to his or her colleagues to be informed about, and abide by, the rules that govern the proceedings of the Senate and the Legislature. ...SixthEach Senator, and each officer or employee of the Senate, acting in a position of leadership shall exercise his or her power and carry out his or her responsibility so as to enhance reasoned and visible decision-making by the Senate.SeventhEach Senator has an obligation to treat each officer or employee of the Senate with fairness and without discrimination, and to ensure that each officer or employee performs only those tasks for which there is a legislative or governmental purpose.EighthEach officer or employee of the Senate has an obligation to perform his or her properly assigned duties using his or her best judgment with diligence and a duty of loyalty to the Senate as an institution. ...TenthEach Senator and each officer or employee of the Senate shall uphold the Constitution of California and the Constitution of the United States, and shall adhere to the spirit and the letter of the laws, rules, and regulations governing officeholder conduct.EleventhEach Senator and each officer or employee of the Senate shall conduct himself or herself in the performance of his or her duties in a manner that does not discredit the Senate; andWHEREAS, Serving in the California Legislature is not a right, but rather a privilege and an honor entrusted to us by the voters of California; andWHEREAS, Senator Mendoza has violated that trust by repeatedly using his office in both houses of the Legislature to target and prey upon women working for him; andWHEREAS, Women working in, volunteering in, or visiting the capitol and district offices of California legislators have a right to feel safe and a right to have protections against retaliation if they have concerns or complaints about their treatment; andWHEREAS, Senator Mendoza has demonstrated through his actions that he does not comprehend the serious predicament he has placed his accusers in, and the damage he has done to them and to the reputation of the Legislature; andWHEREAS, Senator Mendoza has compromised his ability to provide effective representation for the residents of the 32nd Senate District; andWHEREAS, The Assembly Chair of the California Legislative Women's Caucus has stated she will no longer work with Senator Mendoza; andWHEREAS, As stated in Section 3 of Article XX of the California Constitution, the oath of office that California State Senators swear to uphold upon taking office reads as follows: I, ______, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties upon which I am about to enter; andWHEREAS, Paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 5 of Article IV of the California Constitution provides as follows: Each house of the Legislature shall judge the qualifications and elections of its Members and, by rollcall vote entered in the journal, two-thirds of the membership concurring, may expel a Member; andWHEREAS, The California State Senate convenes in a chamber under a portrait of George Washington, a symbol of dedication and integrity; andWHEREAS, Senator Mendoza has had, since November 10, 2017, the option of resigning from the Senate but has not done so; andWHEREAS, The Senate leadership has had, since November 10, 2017, the option of requesting Senator Mendoza to resign from the Senate but has not done so; andWHEREAS, Under the power and authority conferred by the California Constitution, the Senate can, by a two-thirds vote of the membership, expel a Senator; now, therefore, be itResolved by the Senate of the State of California, two-thirds of the membership concurring, That pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 5 of Article IV of the California Constitution, Senator Tony Mendoza, representing the 32nd Senate District, is hereby expelled from the California State Senate for violating the Senate Standards of Conduct cited above, effective immediately.
2	2
3	3	CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20172018 REGULAR SESSION Senate Resolution No. 69Introduced by Senator VidakJanuary 03, 2018 Relative to the expulsion of Senator Tony Mendoza. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTSR 69, as introduced, Vidak. Digest Key
4	4
5	5
6	6
7	7
8	8
9	9	CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20172018 REGULAR SESSION
10	10
11	11	Senate Resolution No. 69
12	12
13	13	Introduced by Senator VidakJanuary 03, 2018
14	14
15	15	Introduced by Senator Vidak
16	16	January 03, 2018
17	17
18	18	Relative to the expulsion of Senator Tony Mendoza.
19	19
20	20	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
21	21
22	22	## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
23	23
24	24	SR 69, as introduced, Vidak.
25	25
26	26
27	27
28	28	## Digest Key
29	29
30	30	## Bill Text
31	31
32	32	WHEREAS, On November 10, 2017, reports began appearing in the media about three former female staff members of Senator Tony Mendoza who complained about him sexually harassing them; and
33	33
34	34	WHEREAS, One woman, Jennifer Kwart, was 19 years of age in 2008 when she worked as an intern in then-Assembly Member Mendozas Norwalk District Office; and
35	35
36	36	WHEREAS, Ms. Kwart reported that in 2008, then-Assembly Member Mendoza arranged for her to fly to San Jose during the 2008 California Democratic Convention, picked her up from the airport, and took her to a hotel suite, where, at his suggestion, they had drinks from the minibar; and
37	37
38	38	WHEREAS, The Sacramento Bee has reported that then-Assembly Member Mendozas campaign finance reports from 2008 verify charges of $409 and $703.20 at the Fairmont Hotel in San Jose for candidate travel, lodging, or meals and a $134.50 payment to Southwest Airlines for spouse or staff travel, lodging, or meals; and
39	39
40	40	WHEREAS, Ms. Kwart reported that in the hotel room then-Assembly Member Mendoza began asking her personal questions about her ex-boyfriends and her taste in men; and
41	41
42	42	WHEREAS, Ms. Kwart reported that she believed that then-Assembly Member Mendoza implied that he wanted to have sex with her; and
43	43
44	44	WHEREAS, Ms. Kwart reported, Then and now, I feel like I was very trapped. I was in a place that I had never been to before. I didnt have a car and I didnt have a way out; and
45	45
46	46	WHEREAS, Ms. Kwart reported that she pretended to receive a telephone call in order to excuse herself. She secretly called her mother and asked her to book a flight home for her immediately. She told then-Assembly Member Mendoza that her grandfather had suffered a stroke and that she needed to return to Los Angeles; and
47	47
48	48	WHEREAS, The Sacramento Bee has reported that Ms. Kwarts mother recalls advising her daughter on how to safely navigate the situation via texts and phone calls; and
49	49
50	50	WHEREAS, A second woman, Haley Myers, who worked for then-Assembly Member Mendoza in 2010, reported that then-Assembly Member Mendoza repeatedly sent her text messages, some late at night, with comments such as thinking of you and ending with a smiley face. He singled out Ms. Myers, who was then 30 years of age and married, to attend after-hours events with him, including several occasions in which she found herself alone with Mr. Mendoza over drinks or dinner; and
51	51
52	52	WHEREAS, The Sacramento Bee has reported that, in September 2010, then-Assembly Member Mendoza invited Ms. Myers to join him for a long weekend at a conference in Pebble Beach. Ms. Myers was suspicious and asked for details about the work that would be expected from her on the trip. In response, then-Assembly Member Mendoza said that the accommodations were nice and described the resort town as beautiful. Ms. Myers declined the invitation and mentioned that she and her husband were celebrating their anniversary; and
53	53
54	54	WHEREAS, Ms. Myers reported then-Assembly Member Mendozas behavior to Rene Bayardo, his Legislative Director, who then reported the matter to the Assembly Committee on Rules; and
55	55
56	56	WHEREAS, Mr. Bayardo stated to the Sacramento Bee, The behavior Haley described to me was alarming, and as a supervisor I had a legal and ethical obligation to report it; and
57	57
58	58	WHEREAS, An Assembly Committee on Rules staff member agreed to tell then-Assembly Member Mendoza not to contact Ms. Myers in a non-professional manner and not to retaliate against either Ms. Myers or Mr. Bayardo; and
59	59
60	60	WHEREAS, An Assembly Committee on Rules staff member followed up with Ms. Myers afterward, who reported that then-Assembly Member Mendoza was perplexed and confused; and
61	61
62	62	WHEREAS, A third woman, a 23-year-old Senate Fellow assigned to Senator Mendozas capitol office, was, during the summer of 2017, repeatedly invited by Senator Mendoza to visit him at night in a home he then shared with Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Len, on the pretext of reviewing her rsum; and
63	63
64	64	WHEREAS, Two Senate staff members who reported Senator Mendozas inappropriate behavior to the Senate Committee on Rules were recently fired; and
65	65
66	66	WHEREAS, The director of the California Senate Fellows program at the time who allegedly did not report Senator Mendozas behavior has been put on indefinite leave by Sacramento State University; and
67	67
68	68	WHEREAS, Senator Mendozas responses and statements about the reports of the three women have been vague nondenials attempting to place blame on so-called misunderstandings, miscommunications, and the media seeking to generate advertising sales; and
69	69
70	70	WHEREAS, When a Sacramento Bee reporter asked Senator Mendoza whether he told a Senate Fellow assigned to his office that she could come back to his house to go over her rsum, Senator Mendoza responded, Generally speaking, I would offer assistance to any of our employees seeking higher-ranking positions in ours or other offices; and
71	71
72	72	WHEREAS, Senator Mendoza has clearly violated at least 10 of the Senate Standards of Conduct, which read as follows:
73	73
74	74	FirstEach Senator shall conduct himself or herself so as to justify the high trust reposed in him or her by the people and to promote public confidence in the integrity of the Senate.
75	75
76	76	SecondA Senator or officer or employee of the Senate shall not engage in unethical conduct or tolerate such conduct by others. ...
77	77
78	78	Third... A Senator shall not use the prestige of his or her office, and an officer or employee of the Senate shall not use the status of his or her position, for material or financial gain or private benefit.
79	79
80	80	Fourth... Each Senator shall fairly characterize the issues confronting the Legislature and accurately inform the public regarding the conduct of his or her office.
81	81
82	82	FifthEach Senator and each officer or employee of the Senate has an obligation to the public and to his or her colleagues to be informed about, and abide by, the rules that govern the proceedings of the Senate and the Legislature. ...
83	83
84	84	SixthEach Senator, and each officer or employee of the Senate, acting in a position of leadership shall exercise his or her power and carry out his or her responsibility so as to enhance reasoned and visible decision-making by the Senate.
85	85
86	86	SeventhEach Senator has an obligation to treat each officer or employee of the Senate with fairness and without discrimination, and to ensure that each officer or employee performs only those tasks for which there is a legislative or governmental purpose.
87	87
88	88	EighthEach officer or employee of the Senate has an obligation to perform his or her properly assigned duties using his or her best judgment with diligence and a duty of loyalty to the Senate as an institution. ...
89	89
90	90	TenthEach Senator and each officer or employee of the Senate shall uphold the Constitution of California and the Constitution of the United States, and shall adhere to the spirit and the letter of the laws, rules, and regulations governing officeholder conduct.
91	91
92	92	EleventhEach Senator and each officer or employee of the Senate shall conduct himself or herself in the performance of his or her duties in a manner that does not discredit the Senate; and
93	93
94	94	WHEREAS, Serving in the California Legislature is not a right, but rather a privilege and an honor entrusted to us by the voters of California; and
95	95
96	96	WHEREAS, Senator Mendoza has violated that trust by repeatedly using his office in both houses of the Legislature to target and prey upon women working for him; and
97	97
98	98	WHEREAS, Women working in, volunteering in, or visiting the capitol and district offices of California legislators have a right to feel safe and a right to have protections against retaliation if they have concerns or complaints about their treatment; and
99	99
100	100	WHEREAS, Senator Mendoza has demonstrated through his actions that he does not comprehend the serious predicament he has placed his accusers in, and the damage he has done to them and to the reputation of the Legislature; and
101	101
102	102	WHEREAS, Senator Mendoza has compromised his ability to provide effective representation for the residents of the 32nd Senate District; and
103	103
104	104	WHEREAS, The Assembly Chair of the California Legislative Women's Caucus has stated she will no longer work with Senator Mendoza; and
105	105
106	106	WHEREAS, As stated in Section 3 of Article XX of the California Constitution, the oath of office that California State Senators swear to uphold upon taking office reads as follows: I, ______, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties upon which I am about to enter; and
107	107
108	108	WHEREAS, Paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 5 of Article IV of the California Constitution provides as follows: Each house of the Legislature shall judge the qualifications and elections of its Members and, by rollcall vote entered in the journal, two-thirds of the membership concurring, may expel a Member; and
109	109
110	110	WHEREAS, The California State Senate convenes in a chamber under a portrait of George Washington, a symbol of dedication and integrity; and
111	111
112	112	WHEREAS, Senator Mendoza has had, since November 10, 2017, the option of resigning from the Senate but has not done so; and
113	113
114	114	WHEREAS, The Senate leadership has had, since November 10, 2017, the option of requesting Senator Mendoza to resign from the Senate but has not done so; and
115	115
116	116	WHEREAS, Under the power and authority conferred by the California Constitution, the Senate can, by a two-thirds vote of the membership, expel a Senator; now, therefore, be it
117	117
118	118	Resolved by the Senate of the State of California, two-thirds of the membership concurring, That pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 5 of Article IV of the California Constitution, Senator Tony Mendoza, representing the 32nd Senate District, is hereby expelled from the California State Senate for violating the Senate Standards of Conduct cited above, effective immediately.