California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SR79

Introduced
1/24/18  
Refer
1/24/18  
Passed
1/25/18  

Caption

Relative to the Standing Rules of the Senate for the 2017–18 Regular Session

Impact

By instituting this rule, Senate Resolution No. 79 aims to clarify the process surrounding paid leaves of absence for Senate members, thereby aligning legislative procedure with the practicalities of modern governance. The rule aims to maintain legislative continuity while also addressing the personal needs of senators. This could affect how the Senate operates during absences, as it establishes formal criteria and protocols that may reduce ambiguities and improve procedural consistency.

Summary

Senate Resolution No. 79, introduced by Senator De León, amends the Standing Rules of the California Senate for the 2017-2018 Regular Session by establishing a formal procedure for members to request a paid leave of absence. This bill recognizes the need for senators to take time off while still ensuring that their official responsibilities and privileges are clearly delineated. The provision allows members to submit a written request to the Committee on Rules, which evaluates the request according to the specified circumstances surrounding the absence. The new rule emphasizes that while a senator is on leave, they cannot perform their legislative duties or utilize Senate resources.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SR 79 appears to lean towards supportive, as it provides a structured approach for senators needing personal time away from duties. The amendment may be viewed favorably as it demonstrates flexibility in addressing personal responsibilities without compromising legislative functions. However, there may also be concerns expressed by critics regarding the potential for misuse or the impact that prolonged absences could have on legislative effectiveness.

Contention

One notable point of contention could arise around the implications of allowing paid leave. Critics might question whether the criteria set by the Committee on Rules are adequate to prevent abuse of the leave policy. Additionally, there may be discussions on how such a policy could impact the perception of accountability within the legislature, particularly in balancing personal needs with public responsibilities. Establishing clear guidelines for extending leaves could be a practical focus to ensure the integrity of legislative operations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MI HB4326

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

MI HB4870

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

NJ AR96

Changes membership of Budget and Labor Committees; clarifies that bill or resolution may be listed on committee agenda for purposes of amendment.

MN HC6

A concurrent resolution recognizing wild rice as sacred and central to the culture and health of Indigenous Peoples in Minnesota and critical to the health and identity of all Minnesota citizens and ecosystems and establishing a commitment to passing legislation to protect wild rice and the freshwater resources upon which it depends.

CA AB3239

Advisory bodies.

CA SB602

Advisory bodies.

CA SB1048

Advisory bodies.

KS HR6003

Providing temporary rules of the House of Representatives for the 2023 session until permanent rules are adopted.