California Assembly Bill AB1026

California 2019-2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/21/19
• Refer: 3/18/19
• Report Pass: 3/20/19
• Refer: 3/21/19
• Report Pass: 4/29/19
• Refer: 5/1/19
• Report Pass: 5/8/19
• Engrossed: 5/16/19
• Refer: 5/16/19
• Refer: 5/29/19
• Report Pass: 6/24/19
• Refer: 6/24/19
• Report Pass: 8/12/19
• Refer: 8/13/19
• Report Pass: 8/20/19
• Refer: 8/20/19
• Enrolled: 9/9/19
• Chaptered: 10/2/19
• Passed: 10/2/19

Caption

Electricity: interconnection rules.

Impact

The bill's impact on state law is substantial, as it aims to streamline the process for extending electricity and gas services by reducing potential regulatory hurdles. By ensuring that the standards applicable at the time of application are the only ones relevant for a set period, the bill is expected to enable a timelier response to new service requests. This could promote development, especially in areas needing better service infrastructure, such as residential, agricultural, and industrial sectors.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1026 amends Section 783 of the Public Utilities Code, which regulates the extension of service by gas and electric corporations to new customers. The bill stipulates that only the specifications, standards, and conditions applicable when a service extension application is approved will govern that project for the following 18 months. This provision is designed to provide clarity and consistency in service extension applications while allowing gas and electrical corporations to modify their specifications as deemed necessary under certain circumstances.

Sentiment

General sentiment around AB 1026 appears supportive among stakeholders who favor a more predictable regulatory environment for utility service applications. Proponents argue this will help to reduce costs and delays associated with service extensions. However, there may be concerns regarding adequate oversight and the potential implications of allowing utility companies to modify standards independently, which could lead to disparities in service quality or safety.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the implications of the bill on local governments and utilities. Specifically, some critics may argue that providing utility corporations with broad discretion to modify construction standards could undermine safety or lead to inconsistent application of rules across different districts. Additionally, questions about accountability when service issues arise from this relaxed regulatory framework are likely to surface in discussions surrounding the bill.