California Assembly Bill AB1044

California 2019-2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/21/19
• Refer: 3/7/19
• Report Pass: 3/18/19
• Refer: 3/19/19
• Report Pass: 3/27/19
• Refer: 3/27/19
• Report Pass: 4/24/19
• Engrossed: 5/2/19
• Refer: 5/2/19
• Refer: 5/16/19
• Report Pass: 6/4/19
• Refer: 6/4/19
• Enrolled: 7/1/19
• Chaptered: 7/12/19
• Passed: 7/12/19

Caption

Elections: Secretary of State.

Impact

The impact of AB 1044 on state laws is significant as it reinforces the responsibilities of the Secretary of State concerning election security and data management. By mandating training for individuals handling voter registration information, the bill seeks to prevent security breaches and ensure accountability in the management of electoral data. Moreover, it clarifies the reporting requirements for election officers to include the contact information of those responsible for conducting elections, enhancing transparency in election management.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1044, introduced by Irwin, focuses on enhancing the security and management of voter registration information in California. The bill amends existing laws to authorize the Secretary of State to require applicants for voter registration information to undergo data security training if it is provided at no cost. This is aimed at ensuring that individuals and entities handling sensitive voter data are well-informed about best practices in data security, potentially reducing the risks associated with data breaches.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment surrounding AB 1044 appears to be supportive from both legislators and advocacy groups focused on election integrity and security. Proponents argue that strengthening data security measures is essential in the current climate where data breaches pose a significant threat to public trust in electoral processes. However, some concern exists regarding the potential additional burdens this may place on election officials, particularly in terms of resource allocation for training programs.

Contention

Notable points of contention primarily center on the implementation of the required training course. While it is designed to enhance data security, there are concerns about the logistics of providing this training at no cost to applicants and the potential implications for compliance and enforcement of training requirements. Critics may argue about the feasibility of monitoring the attendance and effectiveness of such courses when integrating them into the existing electoral processes.