| Old | New | Differences | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | ||
| 1 | + | CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 1050Introduced by Assembly Member CooperFebruary 21, 2019 An act to amend Section 11813 of the Government Code, relating to state agencies. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 1050, as introduced, Cooper. State Government Strategic Planning and Performance and Review Act.The State Government Strategic Planning and Performance and Review Act requires certain state entities to develop a strategic plan and report to the Governor and to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee by April 1, 1995, and by each April 1 thereafter on the steps being taken to develop and adopt a strategic plan. Existing law requires the report to include specified elements and to identify the steps being taken to develop performance measures that could be used for a performance budgeting system or a performance review. The act contains related findings and declarations.This bill would make a nonsubstantive change to the findings and declarations.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: NO Local Program: NO Bill TextThe people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 11813 of the Government Code is amended to read:11813. The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a) Waste and inefficiency in state government undermine the confidence of Californians in government and reduces the state governments ability to adequately address vital public needs.(b) State government, in many instances, is a morass of bureaucratic red tape and regulations that ultimately stifle economic revitalization and further alienate the people the agencies were created to serve.(c) Legislative policymaking, spending decisions, and program oversight are seriously handicapped by insufficient attention to program performance and results.(d) Many of the basic components of performance-based government are missing from day-to-day operations in state government. These include strategic planning, performance measurement, management information systems, performance budget contracts, and management flexibility.(e) The tremendous success of performance reviews in Texas and other states serve as excellent performance-based models of government for California state government.(f) A performance review of California state government could identify ways to reduce state spending through more efficient and effective operations and programs, without reducing services to residents.(g) A performance review of California state government could challenge and question the basic assumptions underlying all state agencies and the programs and services offered by the state in order to identify those that are vital to the best interests of the people of the state and those that no longer meet that goal.(h) The Legislature authorized implementation of performance budgeting pilot projects in Chapter 641 of the Statutes of 1993, which added Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 11800).(i) Strategic planning is a prerequisite for effective performance reviews and effective performance budgeting. | |
| 2 | 2 | ||
| 3 | - | ||
| 3 | + | CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 1050Introduced by Assembly Member CooperFebruary 21, 2019 An act to amend Section 11813 of the Government Code, relating to state agencies. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 1050, as introduced, Cooper. State Government Strategic Planning and Performance and Review Act.The State Government Strategic Planning and Performance and Review Act requires certain state entities to develop a strategic plan and report to the Governor and to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee by April 1, 1995, and by each April 1 thereafter on the steps being taken to develop and adopt a strategic plan. Existing law requires the report to include specified elements and to identify the steps being taken to develop performance measures that could be used for a performance budgeting system or a performance review. The act contains related findings and declarations.This bill would make a nonsubstantive change to the findings and declarations.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: NO Local Program: NO | |
| 4 | 4 | ||
| 5 | - | Amended IN Assembly March 20, 2019 | |
| 6 | 5 | ||
| 7 | - | Amended IN Assembly March 20, 2019 | |
| 6 | + | ||
| 7 | + | ||
| 8 | 8 | ||
| 9 | 9 | CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION | |
| 10 | 10 | ||
| 11 | 11 | Assembly Bill No. 1050 | |
| 12 | 12 | ||
| 13 | 13 | Introduced by Assembly Member CooperFebruary 21, 2019 | |
| 14 | 14 | ||
| 15 | 15 | Introduced by Assembly Member Cooper | |
| 16 | 16 | February 21, 2019 | |
| 17 | 17 | ||
| 18 | - | An act to amend Section 11813 of the Government Code, relating to state agencies. | |
| 18 | + | An act to amend Section 11813 of the Government Code, relating to state agencies. | |
| 19 | 19 | ||
| 20 | 20 | LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST | |
| 21 | 21 | ||
| 22 | 22 | ## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST | |
| 23 | 23 | ||
| 24 | - | AB 1050, as | |
| 24 | + | AB 1050, as introduced, Cooper. State Government Strategic Planning and Performance and Review Act. | |
| 25 | 25 | ||
| 26 | - | The Horse Racing Law establishes the California Horse Racing Board and requires the board, among other things, to maintain a general office for the transaction of its business in Sacramento and to maintain a public record of every vote at the boards general office.This bill would require the board to post the record of its vote on its internet website.The State Government Strategic Planning and Performance and Review Act requires certain state entities to develop a strategic plan and report to the Governor and to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee by April 1, 1995, and by each April 1 thereafter on the steps being taken to develop and adopt a strategic plan. Existing law requires the report to include specified elements and to identify the steps being taken to develop performance measures that could be used for a performance budgeting system or a performance review. The act contains related findings and declarations.This bill would make a nonsubstantive change to the findings and declarations. | |
| 27 | - | ||
| 28 | - | The Horse Racing Law establishes the California Horse Racing Board and requires the board, among other things, to maintain a general office for the transaction of its business in Sacramento and to maintain a public record of every vote at the boards general office. | |
| 29 | - | ||
| 30 | - | This bill would require the board to post the record of its vote on its internet website. | |
| 26 | + | The State Government Strategic Planning and Performance and Review Act requires certain state entities to develop a strategic plan and report to the Governor and to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee by April 1, 1995, and by each April 1 thereafter on the steps being taken to develop and adopt a strategic plan. Existing law requires the report to include specified elements and to identify the steps being taken to develop performance measures that could be used for a performance budgeting system or a performance review. The act contains related findings and declarations.This bill would make a nonsubstantive change to the findings and declarations. | |
| 31 | 27 | ||
| 32 | 28 | The State Government Strategic Planning and Performance and Review Act requires certain state entities to develop a strategic plan and report to the Governor and to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee by April 1, 1995, and by each April 1 thereafter on the steps being taken to develop and adopt a strategic plan. Existing law requires the report to include specified elements and to identify the steps being taken to develop performance measures that could be used for a performance budgeting system or a performance review. The act contains related findings and declarations. | |
| 33 | 29 | ||
| 34 | - | ||
| 35 | - | ||
| 36 | 30 | This bill would make a nonsubstantive change to the findings and declarations. | |
| 37 | - | ||
| 38 | - | ||
| 39 | 31 | ||
| 40 | 32 | ## Digest Key | |
| 41 | 33 | ||
| 42 | 34 | ## Bill Text | |
| 43 | 35 | ||
| 44 | - | The people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section | |
| 36 | + | The people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 11813 of the Government Code is amended to read:11813. The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a) Waste and inefficiency in state government undermine the confidence of Californians in government and reduces the state governments ability to adequately address vital public needs.(b) State government, in many instances, is a morass of bureaucratic red tape and regulations that ultimately stifle economic revitalization and further alienate the people the agencies were created to serve.(c) Legislative policymaking, spending decisions, and program oversight are seriously handicapped by insufficient attention to program performance and results.(d) Many of the basic components of performance-based government are missing from day-to-day operations in state government. These include strategic planning, performance measurement, management information systems, performance budget contracts, and management flexibility.(e) The tremendous success of performance reviews in Texas and other states serve as excellent performance-based models of government for California state government.(f) A performance review of California state government could identify ways to reduce state spending through more efficient and effective operations and programs, without reducing services to residents.(g) A performance review of California state government could challenge and question the basic assumptions underlying all state agencies and the programs and services offered by the state in order to identify those that are vital to the best interests of the people of the state and those that no longer meet that goal.(h) The Legislature authorized implementation of performance budgeting pilot projects in Chapter 641 of the Statutes of 1993, which added Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 11800).(i) Strategic planning is a prerequisite for effective performance reviews and effective performance budgeting. | |
| 45 | 37 | ||
| 46 | 38 | The people of the State of California do enact as follows: | |
| 47 | 39 | ||
| 48 | 40 | ## The people of the State of California do enact as follows: | |
| 49 | 41 | ||
| 50 | - | SECTION 1. Section | |
| 42 | + | SECTION 1. Section 11813 of the Government Code is amended to read:11813. The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a) Waste and inefficiency in state government undermine the confidence of Californians in government and reduces the state governments ability to adequately address vital public needs.(b) State government, in many instances, is a morass of bureaucratic red tape and regulations that ultimately stifle economic revitalization and further alienate the people the agencies were created to serve.(c) Legislative policymaking, spending decisions, and program oversight are seriously handicapped by insufficient attention to program performance and results.(d) Many of the basic components of performance-based government are missing from day-to-day operations in state government. These include strategic planning, performance measurement, management information systems, performance budget contracts, and management flexibility.(e) The tremendous success of performance reviews in Texas and other states serve as excellent performance-based models of government for California state government.(f) A performance review of California state government could identify ways to reduce state spending through more efficient and effective operations and programs, without reducing services to residents.(g) A performance review of California state government could challenge and question the basic assumptions underlying all state agencies and the programs and services offered by the state in order to identify those that are vital to the best interests of the people of the state and those that no longer meet that goal.(h) The Legislature authorized implementation of performance budgeting pilot projects in Chapter 641 of the Statutes of 1993, which added Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 11800).(i) Strategic planning is a prerequisite for effective performance reviews and effective performance budgeting. | |
| 51 | 43 | ||
| 52 | - | SECTION 1. Section | |
| 44 | + | SECTION 1. Section 11813 of the Government Code is amended to read: | |
| 53 | 45 | ||
| 54 | 46 | ### SECTION 1. | |
| 55 | 47 | ||
| 56 | - | ||
| 48 | + | 11813. The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a) Waste and inefficiency in state government undermine the confidence of Californians in government and reduces the state governments ability to adequately address vital public needs.(b) State government, in many instances, is a morass of bureaucratic red tape and regulations that ultimately stifle economic revitalization and further alienate the people the agencies were created to serve.(c) Legislative policymaking, spending decisions, and program oversight are seriously handicapped by insufficient attention to program performance and results.(d) Many of the basic components of performance-based government are missing from day-to-day operations in state government. These include strategic planning, performance measurement, management information systems, performance budget contracts, and management flexibility.(e) The tremendous success of performance reviews in Texas and other states serve as excellent performance-based models of government for California state government.(f) A performance review of California state government could identify ways to reduce state spending through more efficient and effective operations and programs, without reducing services to residents.(g) A performance review of California state government could challenge and question the basic assumptions underlying all state agencies and the programs and services offered by the state in order to identify those that are vital to the best interests of the people of the state and those that no longer meet that goal.(h) The Legislature authorized implementation of performance budgeting pilot projects in Chapter 641 of the Statutes of 1993, which added Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 11800).(i) Strategic planning is a prerequisite for effective performance reviews and effective performance budgeting. | |
| 57 | 49 | ||
| 58 | - | ||
| 50 | + | 11813. The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a) Waste and inefficiency in state government undermine the confidence of Californians in government and reduces the state governments ability to adequately address vital public needs.(b) State government, in many instances, is a morass of bureaucratic red tape and regulations that ultimately stifle economic revitalization and further alienate the people the agencies were created to serve.(c) Legislative policymaking, spending decisions, and program oversight are seriously handicapped by insufficient attention to program performance and results.(d) Many of the basic components of performance-based government are missing from day-to-day operations in state government. These include strategic planning, performance measurement, management information systems, performance budget contracts, and management flexibility.(e) The tremendous success of performance reviews in Texas and other states serve as excellent performance-based models of government for California state government.(f) A performance review of California state government could identify ways to reduce state spending through more efficient and effective operations and programs, without reducing services to residents.(g) A performance review of California state government could challenge and question the basic assumptions underlying all state agencies and the programs and services offered by the state in order to identify those that are vital to the best interests of the people of the state and those that no longer meet that goal.(h) The Legislature authorized implementation of performance budgeting pilot projects in Chapter 641 of the Statutes of 1993, which added Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 11800).(i) Strategic planning is a prerequisite for effective performance reviews and effective performance budgeting. | |
| 59 | 51 | ||
| 60 | - | ||
| 52 | + | 11813. The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a) Waste and inefficiency in state government undermine the confidence of Californians in government and reduces the state governments ability to adequately address vital public needs.(b) State government, in many instances, is a morass of bureaucratic red tape and regulations that ultimately stifle economic revitalization and further alienate the people the agencies were created to serve.(c) Legislative policymaking, spending decisions, and program oversight are seriously handicapped by insufficient attention to program performance and results.(d) Many of the basic components of performance-based government are missing from day-to-day operations in state government. These include strategic planning, performance measurement, management information systems, performance budget contracts, and management flexibility.(e) The tremendous success of performance reviews in Texas and other states serve as excellent performance-based models of government for California state government.(f) A performance review of California state government could identify ways to reduce state spending through more efficient and effective operations and programs, without reducing services to residents.(g) A performance review of California state government could challenge and question the basic assumptions underlying all state agencies and the programs and services offered by the state in order to identify those that are vital to the best interests of the people of the state and those that no longer meet that goal.(h) The Legislature authorized implementation of performance budgeting pilot projects in Chapter 641 of the Statutes of 1993, which added Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 11800).(i) Strategic planning is a prerequisite for effective performance reviews and effective performance budgeting. | |
| 61 | 53 | ||
| 62 | 54 | ||
| 63 | 55 | ||
| 64 | - | 19431. (a) The board shall establish and maintain a general office for the transaction of its business in Sacramento. The board may establish any branch office for the transaction of its business at a place to be determined by it, and may hold meetings at any other place within the state when the interests of the public may be better served. | |
| 65 | - | ||
| 66 | - | (A) | |
| 67 | - | ||
| 68 | - | ||
| 69 | - | ||
| 70 | - | (b) A public record of every vote shall be maintained at the boards general office. office and posted on the boards internet website. | |
| 71 | - | ||
| 72 | - | (At) | |
| 73 | - | ||
| 74 | - | ||
| 75 | - | ||
| 76 | - | (c) At least four members of the board shall concur in the taking of any official action or in the exercise of any of the boards duties, powers, or functions. | |
| 77 | - | ||
| 78 | - | ||
| 79 | - | ||
| 80 | - | ||
| 81 | - | ||
| 82 | - | The Legislature finds and declares all of the following: | |
| 83 | - | ||
| 84 | - | ||
| 56 | + | 11813. The Legislature finds and declares all of the following: | |
| 85 | 57 | ||
| 86 | 58 | (a) Waste and inefficiency in state government undermine the confidence of Californians in government and reduces the state governments ability to adequately address vital public needs. | |
| 87 | 59 | ||
| 88 | - | ||
| 89 | - | ||
| 90 | 60 | (b) State government, in many instances, is a morass of bureaucratic red tape and regulations that ultimately stifle economic revitalization and further alienate the people the agencies were created to serve. | |
| 91 | - | ||
| 92 | - | ||
| 93 | 61 | ||
| 94 | 62 | (c) Legislative policymaking, spending decisions, and program oversight are seriously handicapped by insufficient attention to program performance and results. | |
| 95 | 63 | ||
| 96 | - | ||
| 97 | - | ||
| 98 | 64 | (d) Many of the basic components of performance-based government are missing from day-to-day operations in state government. These include strategic planning, performance measurement, management information systems, performance budget contracts, and management flexibility. | |
| 99 | - | ||
| 100 | - | ||
| 101 | 65 | ||
| 102 | 66 | (e) The tremendous success of performance reviews in Texas and other states serve as excellent performance-based models of government for California state government. | |
| 103 | 67 | ||
| 104 | - | ||
| 105 | - | ||
| 106 | 68 | (f) A performance review of California state government could identify ways to reduce state spending through more efficient and effective operations and programs, without reducing services to residents. | |
| 107 | - | ||
| 108 | - | ||
| 109 | 69 | ||
| 110 | 70 | (g) A performance review of California state government could challenge and question the basic assumptions underlying all state agencies and the programs and services offered by the state in order to identify those that are vital to the best interests of the people of the state and those that no longer meet that goal. | |
| 111 | 71 | ||
| 112 | - | ||
| 113 | - | ||
| 114 | 72 | (h) The Legislature authorized implementation of performance budgeting pilot projects in Chapter 641 of the Statutes of 1993, which added Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 11800). | |
| 115 | - | ||
| 116 | - | ||
| 117 | 73 | ||
| 118 | 74 | (i) Strategic planning is a prerequisite for effective performance reviews and effective performance budgeting. |