California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB118

Introduced
12/3/18  
Refer
1/24/19  
Refer
1/24/19  
Engrossed
4/11/19  
Engrossed
4/11/19  
Refer
4/11/19  
Refer
4/11/19  
Refer
4/24/19  
Refer
4/24/19  
Report Pass
8/28/19  
Report Pass
8/28/19  
Refer
8/28/19  
Refer
8/28/19  
Report Pass
9/3/19  
Report Pass
9/3/19  
Refer
9/3/19  
Refer
9/3/19  
Report Pass
9/6/19  
Report Pass
9/6/19  
Refer
9/6/19  
Refer
9/6/19  
Report Pass
9/10/19  
Report Pass
9/10/19  
Enrolled
9/12/19  
Enrolled
9/12/19  
Chaptered
10/13/19  
Chaptered
10/13/19  
Passed
10/13/19  

Caption

State employment: State Bargaining Units 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17, 20, and 21.

Impact

The bill primarily affects the funding and approval process of expenditures tied to state employee compensation. By stipulating that provisions in collective bargaining agreements involving financial implications do not take effect without legislative appropriation, AB118 reinforces the Legislature's role in shaping fiscal policies related to state employment. It also allows state employers and employee bargaining units to reopen negotiations if required funding is not appropriated, which adds flexibility in managing state employee compensation amid budgetary constraints.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 118, enacted as Chapter 859, relates to state employment by amending and adding various sections to the Government Code concerning state bargaining units. The bill aims to approve provisions within memoranda of understanding between the state employer and specific bargaining units that involve expenditures requiring legislative approval. It establishes that such provisions become effective only if specifically funded by the Legislature, ensuring fiscal responsibility and legislative oversight in state employee compensation and benefits agreements.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB118 is generally supportive among state legislators who wish to ensure budgetary discipline and prioritize state fiscal health. Proponents argue that the bill safeguards taxpayer interests by providing necessary checks on how public funds are allocated. However, some critics may express concerns about the potential adverse effects on employee morale and the negotiations process, particularly if the reopening of negotiations leads to prolonged disputes without clear resolutions.

Contention

Key points of contention include the implications for state employees represented by the affected bargaining units, particularly concerning health care prefunding and retirement benefits. The bill introduces strict guidelines specifying that new state employees represented by Bargaining Unit 5 must accrue a minimum of 15 years of service to receive any portion of employer contributions toward retiree health benefits. This aspect of the bill has raised discussions about equity and the long-term sustainability of employee compensation structures, especially in light of evolving economic conditions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB118

Public safety.

CA SB873

State public employment: memorandum of understanding: approval: State Bargaining Units 9 and 10.

CA AB119

State employment: State Bargaining Units.

CA SB119

State employment: State Bargaining Units.

CA AB1832

State public employment: memorandum of understanding: approval: State Bargaining Units 9 and 10.

CA AB106

State employment: State Bargaining Units.

CA AB142

State employment: State Bargaining Units: memoranda of understanding: addenda.

CA SB142

State employment: State Bargaining Units.