California Assembly Bill AB1185

California 2019-2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/21/19
• Refer: 3/11/19
• Report Pass: 4/2/19
• Engrossed: 5/29/19
• Refer: 5/30/19
• Refer: 6/12/19
• Report Pass: 7/2/19
• Enrolled: 8/31/20
• Chaptered: 9/30/20
• Passed: 9/30/20

Caption

County board of supervisors: sheriff oversight.

Impact

This legislation significantly impacts the governance structure of sheriff's departments across California. By empowering local oversight boards and an inspector general, it aims to foster accountability within these offices. This could lead to improved practices within sheriff departments, particularly in matters of transparency and accountability to the public. It signals a shift towards greater citizen engagement in law enforcement oversight, which may consequently enhance community trust in sheriff departments.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1185, also known as the Sheriff Oversight Bill, aims to enhance the oversight of sheriffs in California counties by allowing the establishment of sheriff oversight boards. These boards can either be created through an action by the county's board of supervisors or via a vote by the residents of the county. The primary purpose of these boards is to assist in overseeing the conduct of sheriffs, ensuring that they perform their duties effectively and transparently. Additionally, the bill provides for the creation of an office of inspector general which has the authority to issue subpoenas in matters of investigation related to sheriff activities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1185 appears to be largely supportive among those advocating for law enforcement reform and community oversight. Proponents view it as a critical step towards ensuring that sheriffs operate within the bounds of their authority while maintaining public trust. However, there may be opposition from those within law enforcement who perceive this enhanced oversight as unnecessary interference that could hinder operations and decision-making.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding the bill may center on the degree of authority granted to the oversight boards and the inspector general. Opponents may argue that the ability to issue subpoenas could complicate investigations or conflict with law enforcement operations. Supporters, on the other hand, argue that such powers are essential for meaningful oversight and the promotion of accountability within sheriff departments. The debate may also encompass discussions about the implications of increased civilian involvement in law enforcement oversight, reflecting broader societal concerns about police practices.