The passage of AB 120 is pertinent for ensuring that the budgetary processes align with the state's financial goals and legislative priorities. Although it does not directly allocate funds or impose definitive financial obligations, it establishes a legislative foundation that influences the subsequent appropriations and adjustments that will arise from the budget discussions. The bill thus represents a commitment to structured fiscal governance, which is critical for the functioning of state services and programs.
Summary
Assembly Bill 120, introduced by Assembly Member Ting, relates to the Budget Act of 2019 and serves primarily to articulate the intent of the Legislature to enact statutory changes regarding the fiscal operations of the state for that year. The bill underscores the obligation to address budgetary considerations in a formalized manner, reflecting the legislative body's role in overseeing state financial management. By explicitly stating its intent, the bill aims to pave the way for necessary amendments to existing laws that would support the budgetary framework for 2019.
Contention
One notable point around AB 120 may involve the discussions on the implications of its legislative intent. While framing an intent is a routine procedure, it can lead to debates regarding what specific changes may be proposed and who stands to benefit from potential alterations in the budgetary allocations. Critics may raise concerns about transparency and accountability, questioning whether the intent is aligned with the best interests of various stakeholders within the state, such as local governments, non-profits, and the general public.
A resolution to direct the Clerk of the House of Representatives to only present to the Governor enrolled House bills finally passed by both houses of the One Hundred Third Legislature.