The impact of AB 1247 on state law appears to be minimal, as the bill does not introduce new legal standards or requirements but rather focuses on refining the existing framework. By making technical adjustments, this bill facilitates better understanding and application of civil procedures in California's judicial system. Such upkeep is crucial in ensuring that legal practitioners and the public can rely on clearly defined legal texts without confusion over outdated or ambiguous language.
Summary
Assembly Bill No. 1247, introduced by Assembly Member Petrie-Norris, seeks to amend Section 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure in California. The proposed amendment is primarily a technical and nonsubstantive change that aims to clarify existing provisions within the state's Code of Civil Procedure. It reaffirms the structure of the Code, which divides the civil procedure into four main parts: Courts of Justice, Civil Actions, Special Proceedings of a Civil Nature, and Miscellaneous Provisions. This is an essential maintenance update aimed at improving the clarity and organization of the statute without making significant legal changes.
Contention
Due to its technical nature, AB 1247 is unlikely to provoke significant contention among lawmakers or stakeholders. However, discussions may arise about the necessity of legislative updates that do not produce substantive changes versus the need for continuous improvement and clarity in legal texts. Overall, the bill exemplifies an approach to legislative housekeeping that seeks to streamline the civil procedure without instigating broader debates about civil law or judicial reforms.
Relating to court costs imposed on conviction and deposited to the courthouse security fund or the municipal court building security fund; increasing fees.