California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1385

Introduced
2/22/19  
Refer
3/25/19  
Report Pass
3/25/19  
Report Pass
3/25/19  
Refer
3/26/19  
Refer
3/26/19  
Report Pass
4/9/19  
Report Pass
4/9/19  
Refer
4/9/19  
Refer
4/24/19  
Refer
4/24/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Engrossed
5/23/19  
Engrossed
5/23/19  
Refer
5/24/19  
Refer
5/24/19  
Refer
6/6/19  
Report Pass
6/21/19  
Report Pass
6/21/19  
Refer
6/21/19  
Refer
6/21/19  
Report Pass
7/3/19  
Report Pass
7/3/19  
Refer
7/3/19  
Refer
7/3/19  
Refer
8/12/19  

Caption

Court reporter fees.

Impact

The implementation of AB 1385 is expected to impact the financial structure surrounding court reporting services significantly. By revising the fee schedule, the bill aims to ensure that court reporters receive fair compensation for their work, addressing a long-standing issue where reporter fees had not kept pace with inflation or the cost of living. This change is intended to attract and retain quality professionals in the field, thereby enhancing the efficiency and quality of court services across California.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1385, introduced by Assembly Member Santiago, seeks to enact significant changes to the fees associated with court reporting services in California. The bill outlines an increase in fees for transcription services, which have remained unchanged for decades. Prior to the bill, the fee for an original printed court transcript was $0.85 per 100 words, with adjustments only occurring once in 105 years for copying fees. The new provisions set incremental increases to a fee of $1.13 per 100 words by January 1, 2023, highlighting the need to modernize compensation rates for court reporters.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding AB 1385 appears to be generally supportive among those within the judicial system, particularly among court reporters who have sought fair compensation for their services. However, there may be concerns from other parties regarding increased costs associated with legal proceedings that stem from higher transcription fees. The bill represents a necessary adjustment in the eyes of many advocates who argue that fair compensation is essential for maintaining the integrity of the judicial process.

Contention

While AB 1385 seeks to improve compensation for court reporters, some stakeholders may raise concerns about the financial implications of raising transcription fees on court costs and access to justice. Critics could argue that higher costs may deter individuals from pursuing legal actions due to increased financial burdens, ultimately impacting access to state services. Balancing the needs of court reporters with the overarching goal of access to justice for all Californians presents a notable point of contention surrounding this legislation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB991

Court reporters.

CA AB2757

Court reporters.

NV SB191

Revises provisions relating to court reporters and court reporting firms. (BDR 54-14)

CA SB163

Budget Act of 2022.

CA AB163

State government.

CA AB1313

Higher education: prohibited debt collection practices.

CA AB1520

Court Reporters Board of California.

CA SB1146

Civil procedure: electronic filing, trial delays, and remote depositions.