California Assembly Bill AB1437

California 2019-2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/22/19
• Refer: 3/25/19
• Report Pass: 3/26/19
• Refer: 3/27/19
• Report Pass: 4/10/19
• Refer: 4/10/19
• Report Pass: 4/25/19
• Refer: 4/25/19
• Refer: 5/15/19
• Report Pass: 5/16/19
• Engrossed: 5/29/19
• Refer: 5/30/19
• Refer: 6/12/19
• Report Pass: 6/20/19
• Refer: 6/24/19
• Refer: 7/8/19
• Report Pass: 8/30/19
• Enrolled: 9/10/19
• Vetoed: 10/13/19

Caption

Local government: redevelopment: revenues from property tax override rates.

Impact

The bill modifies existing laws that govern the distribution of property tax revenues from former redevelopment agencies, dissolved in 2012. By mandating specific allocations to local services and programs rather than a general fund, AB 1437 addresses the unique needs of the City of Brea and possibly similar municipalities. This legislative change may provide more consistent funding for critical services, thereby enhancing local governance and services related to health care and public safety.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1437, introduced by Assembly Member Chen, aims to amend Section 34183 of the Health and Safety Code concerning local government and redevelopment funding. The bill seeks to ensure that revenues from property tax override rates, particularly those approved by voters of various local entities, are allocated to support specific programs, such as a mobile intensive care program in the City of Brea, instead of being funneled into the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund of successor agencies. This reallocation aims to maintain financial support for local programs deemed essential by their communities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1437 appears largely supportive, particularly within the local government and healthcare sectors, as they recognize the importance of dedicated funding for essential programs. Stakeholders argue that the amendment provides necessary support to local initiatives that benefit the community directly. However, there may be some contention regarding the impacts of this bill on broader redevelopment goals if resources are diverted away from the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund.

Contention

Notable points of contention include discussions over the potential implications for broader funding for redevelopment efforts in California. While proponents emphasize the importance of local control and dedicated funding for vital services, critics could raise concerns about the ramifications this specialized funding structure might have on the overall effectiveness of redevelopment initiatives statewide. Furthermore, the bill's requirement for allocations to be deemed correct by county auditor-controllers prior to a specified date adds a layer of complexity to property tax administration that may invoke scrutiny from local entities.