California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1462

Introduced
2/22/19  
Introduced
2/22/19  
Refer
3/25/19  
Refer
3/25/19  
Report Pass
3/25/19  
Report Pass
3/25/19  
Refer
3/26/19  
Report Pass
4/1/19  
Report Pass
4/1/19  
Refer
4/2/19  
Refer
4/2/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Report Pass
4/10/19  
Refer
4/22/19  
Refer
4/22/19  
Refer
4/24/19  
Refer
4/24/19  
Failed
2/3/20  

Caption

Hazardous substances: lead: cleanup: Exide Technologies facility.

Impact

The legislation modifies existing regulations under the Health and Safety Code concerning the management of hazardous substances, primarily focusing on lead and its impact on community safety. By providing substantial funding specifically for the cleanup of lead contamination, AB1462 strengthens California's regulatory framework pertaining to hazardous waste management. The allocated funds will enable the Department of Toxic Substances Control to undertake necessary investigative and remedial actions efficiently, potentially setting a precedent for proactive environmental health measures in similar scenarios across the state.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1462, introduced by Assembly Member Santiago, aims to address hazardous substance concerns specifically related to lead contamination around the Exide Technologies facility in Vernon, California. The bill proposes to appropriate $100 million from the General Fund as a loan to the Toxic Substances Control Account. This funding is designated to accelerate the investigation and cleanup of properties and communities within a 1.7-mile radius of the facility that report lead contamination levels exceeding 80 parts per million. The intent of the legislation is to ensure timely and effective remediation efforts, thereby safeguarding public health in affected areas.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB1462 appears to be favorable among environmental advocates and public health officials, who see the bill as a critical step towards mitigating the adverse effects of toxic waste on vulnerable communities. There is a general understanding that swift action is necessary in cases of pronounced environmental hazards. Nevertheless, some concerns have been voiced regarding the adequacy of funding and the speed of implementation, with stakeholders advocating for continual oversight to ensure that cleanup efforts do not falter due to budgetary constraints.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the funding mechanism and the timeline for cleanup operations. Critics have raised questions about the adequacy of the $100 million loan and whether it will suffice for comprehensive assessments and cleanup activities. Additionally, the bill's impact on future funding priorities and whether other environmental initiatives may suffer as a result has been a topic of discussion among legislators. Stakeholders emphasize the need for transparency and accountability in the appropriation process, ensuring that the funds are used strictly for their intended purposes.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB178

Public resources trailer bill.

CA AB719

Underground storage tanks: Expedited Claim Pilot Project.

CA SB178

Public resources trailer bill.

CA AB2189

Hazardous substances: lead: cleanup: Exide Technologies facility.

CA AB203

Public resources.

CA SB120

Public resources.

CA AB156

Public resources: omnibus budget trailer bill.

CA SB156

Public resources: omnibus budget trailer bill.