Construction Manager/General Contractor method: transportation projects.
The proposed amendments have a significant impact on state laws by enabling regional transportation agencies to utilize the CM/GC method for a broader range of transportation projects, including those that are not part of the state highway system. This change is particularly relevant given the ongoing challenges presented in terms of infrastructure development and repair, as it allows for a more flexible and responsive approach to the construction process. The bill also asserts that no reimbursement is required for local agencies or school districts for costs incurred due to new or modified regulations introduced by this act, which can relieve some of the financial burdens they may face.
Assembly Bill No. 1475, introduced by Bauer-Kahan, amends certain sections of the California Public Contract Code pertaining to the Construction Manager/General Contractor (CM/GC) method for transportation projects. The bill aims to redefine who qualifies as a construction manager and expands the types of projects to which the CM/GC method can apply. Historically, this project delivery method was limited to highways, bridges, and tunnels with construction costs exceeding $10 million. This legislation revises the definition of a construction manager to ensure that the entity is a licensed contractor, thereby enhancing the qualifications expected of those involved in major transportation projects.
The sentiment surrounding AB 1475 appears to be positive among proponents of infrastructure improvements and efficiency in public contracting. Supporters argue that the CM/GC method enhances collaboration during the project design phase, resulting in improved project constructability and time savings. Conversely, there may be concerns from opponents regarding the implications of redefining the scope of projects permissible under this contracting method, particularly in relation to ensuring quality and accountability in public construction projects.
Points of contention primarily revolve around the implications of expanding the CM/GC authority for regional transportation agencies. Advocates of the bill aim to alleviate bottlenecks in project delivery, especially in the face of funding challenges arising from the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017. However, critics may argue that modifying the definitions and scope raises questions about oversight and standards in public contracting. By introducing changes that allow for broader authorization under the CM/GC method, the potential for mismanagement or less stringent compliance with regulatory frameworks could become a critical issue.