California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB179

Introduced
1/9/19  
Introduced
1/9/19  
Refer
1/24/19  
Refer
1/24/19  
Report Pass
4/23/19  
Report Pass
4/23/19  
Refer
4/23/19  
Refer
4/23/19  
Report Pass
5/1/19  
Report Pass
5/1/19  
Engrossed
5/28/19  
Engrossed
5/28/19  
Refer
5/29/19  
Refer
5/29/19  
Refer
6/6/19  
Refer
6/6/19  
Report Pass
6/25/19  
Report Pass
6/25/19  
Refer
6/25/19  
Refer
6/25/19  
Report Pass
7/10/19  
Report Pass
7/10/19  
Refer
7/10/19  
Refer
7/10/19  
Enrolled
9/5/19  
Enrolled
9/5/19  
Chaptered
10/12/19  
Passed
10/12/19  

Caption

New Motor Vehicle Board.

Impact

The bill reinforces the rights of new motor vehicle dealers by ensuring they are adequately compensated for warranty work at rates established by themselves rather than manufacturers. This modification is expected to empower franchisees in their negotiations with franchisors. Additionally, it prohibits franchisors from unfairly restricting dealers' choices regarding vendors, thereby promoting a more competitive marketplace. These changes are anticipated to have a significant impact on the franchising landscape within the motor vehicle sector in California.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 179, also known as AB179, focuses on amending various sections of the California Vehicle Code regarding the New Motor Vehicle Board and its functions. The bill reestablishes the authority of the board to hear protests from vehicle franchises against manufacturers and establishes procedures for resolving disputes until January 1, 2030. It is designed to provide a structured approach to dispute resolution between dealerships and manufacturers, ensuring that the interests of both parties are fairly represented and adjudicated.

Sentiment

The sentiment towards AB179 appears to be largely positive among dealer associations and consumer protection advocates, as it addresses inequalities in the current reimbursement structure and enhances dealers' rights. However, manufacturers have shown concern over the potential implications of increased operational costs and regulatory burdens stemming from the bill. This has led to a polarized discussion about the balance of power between dealers and manufacturers.

Contention

Notably, contention around AB179 stems from the potential restrictions it places on manufacturers regarding their relationships with franchisees. The bill aims to improve the franchise system by preventing manufacturers from engaging in chargebacks or adverse actions against dealers without just cause. Critics argue that these changes could lead to unintended consequences, such as limiting manufacturers' flexibility in managing their distribution networks or increasing discord in manufacturer-dealer relations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2107

New Motor Vehicle Board.

CA AB473

Motor vehicle manufacturers, distributors, and dealers.

OR HB2127

Relating to motor vehicle dealer franchises.