California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1871

Introduced
1/7/20  
Refer
1/17/20  
Refer
1/17/20  
Report Pass
2/25/20  
Report Pass
2/25/20  
Refer
2/26/20  
Refer
2/26/20  
Engrossed
6/15/20  
Engrossed
6/15/20  
Refer
6/16/20  
Refer
6/16/20  
Refer
7/1/20  

Caption

Budget Act of 2020.

Impact

The impact of AB 1871 is primarily on how the budget is structured and appropriated in California. By articulating the intention of the Legislature, the bill aims to streamline the legislative process related to budgeting, making it clear and structured. This can potentially facilitate quicker approval processes and ensure that necessary funding is allocated to various programs and services throughout the state. The clarity provided by such legislation helps to minimize misunderstanding and misallocation of budgetary resources.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1871, introduced by Assembly Member Ting, is focused on expressing the Legislature's intent to enact statutory changes related to the Budget Act of 2020. The bill outlines the legislative framework that is necessary for the state's budget for the 2020 session, emphasizing the financial appropriations essential to ensure that state operations can continue effectively. It serves as a crucial mechanism for aligning budgetary measures with legislative priorities for that fiscal year.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around AB 1871 appears to be positive among legislators who recognize the importance of maintaining an efficient and effective budgeting process. The legislation garnered support from a majority within the Assembly, as demonstrated by the voting outcome of 60 yeas to 14 nays during the third reading. Supporters anticipate that this bill will aid in clear budgetary planning and execution, although some concerns may exist about the adequacy of the budget itself as it relates to meeting broader state needs.

Contention

While there is broad support for maintaining budgetary coherence in California through AB 1871, there might be some contention centered around the specific statutory changes that are yet to be detailed. Critiques may arise relating to what those changes entail and how they could potentially shape funding priorities, possibly favoring certain sectors over others. As with many budgetary discussions, there could also be differing opinions on the sufficiency of allocations for critical services that cater to underrepresented communities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA ACA2

Legislature: retirement.

CA SB699

Legislature: constitutional course.

MI HR0041

A resolution to direct the Clerk of the House of Representatives to only present to the Governor enrolled House bills finally passed by both houses of the One Hundred Third Legislature.

CA AB599

Legislative Modernization Working Group.

CA AB1

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

CA AB478

Legislature: Member training.

CA AB1577

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

AK SCR1

Art. Ii, Sec. 16, Const: Veto Recon