California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1879

Introduced
1/7/20  
Refer
1/17/20  
Refer
1/17/20  
Report Pass
2/25/20  
Refer
2/26/20  
Refer
2/26/20  
Engrossed
6/15/20  
Engrossed
6/15/20  
Refer
6/16/20  
Refer
6/16/20  
Refer
7/1/20  

Caption

Budget Act of 2020.

Impact

AB 1879, while primarily focusing on budgetary intents, plays a critical role in shaping state fiscal policies. It impacts various sectors reliant on state funding, including education, healthcare, and infrastructure. By articulating the legislative intent to enact statutory changes, the bill sets the stage for subsequent laws and budgeting practices that affect these sectors. It conveys a message of fiscal responsibility and responsiveness to the needs of Californians, potentially influencing future legislative discussions and decisions.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1879 aims to outline the legislative intent regarding the changes that will be enacted in relation to the Budget Act of 2020. The bill serves as a framework for modifications and adjustments to the state budget, seeking to establish clear guidelines for spending and allocations within California for the fiscal year. This approach reflects the commitment of the legislature to ensure that budgetary procedures are aligned with the state's financial goals and priorities.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding AB 1879 appears to be supportive within the legislative framework, as it has garnered a majority of votes in favor during its consideration. Legislators recognize the importance of establishing a clear budgetary directive which can facilitate informed decision-making concerning state expenditures. However, mixed opinions may arise from community groups or organizations that have stakes in specific budget allocations, advocating for targeted funding in specific areas impacted by the budget.

Contention

While the intent to enact statutory changes seems straightforward, there could be points of contention regarding specific allocations and the prioritization of funds. Stakeholders may diverge in interests, leading to debates on whether certain areas receive adequate funding or if the budget reflects the community's needs accurately. Critics might argue that the process does not adequately consider public input or the unique needs of various communities across California, emphasizing a need for further transparency and engagement in the budgetary process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA ACA2

Legislature: retirement.

CA SB699

Legislature: constitutional course.

MI HR0041

A resolution to direct the Clerk of the House of Representatives to only present to the Governor enrolled House bills finally passed by both houses of the One Hundred Third Legislature.

CA AB599

Legislative Modernization Working Group.

CA AB478

Legislature: Member training.

CA AB1

Collective bargaining: Legislature.

AK SCR13

Art. Ii, Sec. 16, Const:affirm Compliance

AK SCR1

Art. Ii, Sec. 16, Const: Veto Recon