California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB193

Introduced
1/10/19  
Introduced
1/10/19  
Refer
2/4/19  
Refer
2/4/19  
Report Pass
3/5/19  
Refer
3/6/19  
Report Pass
3/20/19  
Report Pass
3/20/19  
Refer
3/21/19  
Failed
2/3/20  

Caption

Professions and vocations.

Impact

AB 193 is expected to have significant implications on state laws regarding professional and vocational licensing. The bill proposes to amend several sections of the Business and Professions Code, eliminating certain licensure requirements, such as those for custom upholsterers. Additionally, it will remove shampooing hair and applying makeup from the regulated practices under the Barbering and Cosmetology Act, marking a shift in regulatory focus and potentially expanding the workforce by making it easier for unlicensed individuals to perform these tasks after adequate disclosure. This shift aims to reduce costs for consumers and expand employment opportunities.

Summary

Assembly Bill 193, introduced by Assembly Member Patterson, seeks to address the burdensome nature of occupational licensing in California. The bill mandates the Department of Consumer Affairs to conduct a comprehensive review of all licensing requirements starting January 1, 2021. It aims to identify unnecessary licensing requirements that may inhibit economic opportunity and job creation in various industries. The legislation is particularly focused on facilitating licensure portability for active duty service members, veterans, and military spouses, ensuring that these individuals can more easily navigate licensing when moving to new locales.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 193 appears to be largely supportive, particularly among stakeholders advocating for reduced regulatory burdens on workers. Proponents argue that the bill will promote greater economic activity and reduce barriers to entry for skilled professions, especially for those who have served in the military. However, some concerns persist regarding the potential lowering of standards in cosmetology and other regulated fields, reflecting a divide between maintaining professional standards and promoting economic freedom.

Contention

Despite the bill's positive reception among some factions, there are notable points of contention. Critics argue that eliminating certain licensing requirements could compromise public health and safety, especially in fields that have traditionally been heavily regulated, such as cosmetology. The push for licensure portability also raises questions about maintaining consistent standards across states and professions. Lawmakers and stakeholders will need to balance the desire for regulatory simplicity with the need for consumer protection.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB247

Professions and vocations: license requirement: business: surety bond requirement.

CA SB999

Barbering and cosmetology.

CA SB296

Barbering and cosmetology: nail care: superfluous hair removal.

CA SB1084

Barbering and cosmetology.

CA AB625

Barbering and cosmetology.

CA SB803

Barbering and cosmetology.

CA AB2196

Barbering and cosmetology.

CA AB2166

Barbering and cosmetology: hair types and textures.