California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1975

Introduced
1/22/20  
Introduced
1/22/20  
Refer
4/24/20  
Refer
4/24/20  
Report Pass
5/4/20  
Report Pass
5/4/20  
Refer
5/5/20  

Caption

Postretirement health benefits: contributions: County of Madera.

Impact

The bill specifies that employees must have a minimum of five years of service with the County of Madera and a total of at least ten years in the public employee system to qualify for full benefits. Contributions from the employer increase progressively with years of service, reaching up to 100% after 20 years. This may lead to improved employee retention and satisfaction, as it enhances the retirement benefits package for county employees, making it competitive and appealing.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1975, introduced by Assembly Member Bigelow, aims to establish specific guidelines for postretirement health benefits for employees in the County of Madera. This legislation is particularly significant as it creates an alternative funding formula for employer contributions to healthcare benefits, targeting unrepresented and extra help employees, appointed department heads, and represented employees as defined in a collective bargaining agreement. The bill is designed to ensure these employees have access to healthcare benefits upon retirement based on their years of service.

Sentiment

Support for AB 1975 is likely rooted in the desire to provide better postemployment benefits for county workers, reflecting a proactive approach to employee welfare. However, there may also be concerns regarding the financial implications for the County of Madera, considering budgets and funding allocations. The bill's passage reflects a broader trend of municipalities striving to balance employee benefits with fiscal responsibility.

Contention

Some contention may arise regarding the necessity of creating a special law for the County of Madera instead of applying general laws applicable to all counties. Critics may argue that unique provisions could lead to disparities in how benefits are allocated across counties, raising questions about fairness and equality in public employee benefits in California.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB658

Public employment: retirement: benefits.

CA SB48

State public employee benefits.

CA SB28

State public employment: memoranda of understanding: approval.

CA SB131

State public employment: memorandum of understanding: approval.

MN HF3212

State Patrol retirement plan and public employees police and fire retirement plan provisions modified; employee contribution rates reduced; postretirement adjustments increased; vesting and return to work requirements modified, employer contribution rate decreased, and supplemental employer contribution added; and direct state aids increased and added.

PA HB1379

In membership, contributions and benefits, providing for supplemental annuity commencing 2025; in municipal pensions, providing for 2025 special ad hoc municipal police and firefighter postretirement adjustment; and, in benefits, providing for supplemental annuity commencing 2025.

MN HF3100

Pension finance bill.

AL HB190

Jefferson County, General Retirement System for Employees of Jefferson County, amended to identify the Personnel Board of Jefferson County as the civil service system of the county