California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2026

Introduced
1/30/20  
Introduced
1/30/20  
Refer
4/24/20  
Report Pass
5/4/20  
Report Pass
5/4/20  
Refer
5/5/20  

Caption

Security planning: major sporting and entertainment events.

Impact

The enactment of AB 2026 would have significant implications for state laws governing emergency services. It lays the groundwork for a collaborative approach to security management by fostering agreements between state and local authorities, which is vital in managing large-scale events. Furthermore, the bill includes provisions for the OES to assess and reduce risks associated with major sporting events, particularly concerning issues like human trafficking and discrimination, and mandates the establishment of memorandums of understanding with host cities and committees.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2026, introduced by Assembly Member Gabriel, focuses on establishing a robust framework for public safety and security planning in anticipation of major sporting events, specifically the 2026 FIFA World Cup hosted in California. This bill reinforces the roles and responsibilities of the California Office of Emergency Services (OES) in preparing for the management and delivery of security and safety at venues in Los Angeles and the San Francisco Bay Area. The bill mandates collaborations between the OES and local governments to ensure comprehensive planning and resource allocation leading up to the event.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2026 appears to be generally positive, underlining a proactive stance from lawmakers and the OES toward public safety. Supporters view this initiative as essential for enhancing security at a globally significant event, projecting California as a safe host. However, concerns may arise from stakeholders who worry about the adequacy of the resources and the effectiveness of the coordination among various agencies involved in the security framework, potentially creating points of contention regarding implementation.

Contention

Noteworthy points of contention include the adequacy of resources needed to implement the measures outlined in the bill and the effectiveness of the collaborations between various local and state agencies. Opponents may argue that the bill, while well-intentioned, could lead to bureaucratic complexities that complicate rather than streamline security efforts. Furthermore, detailed strategies concerning how to address issues such as human trafficking and discrimination are critical, as ensuring these aspects could determine the overall success of the event's public safety protocols.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1450

Public safety: large-scale sporting events.

CA AB549

Emergency services: human trafficking.

CA SB321

Literacy: libraries: Local Public Library Partnership Program.

CA SB605

State attorneys and administrative law judges: compensation.

CA AB2864

Coastal resources: oil spills.

CA AB1575

Public postsecondary education: students codes of conduct: advisers.

CA AB2057

San Francisco Bay area: public transportation.

CA SB867

Sea level rise: planning and adaptation.