California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2028

Introduced
1/30/20  
Refer
2/14/20  
Refer
2/14/20  
Report Pass
5/13/20  
Refer
5/13/20  
Refer
5/13/20  
Refer
6/2/20  
Refer
6/2/20  
Report Pass
6/3/20  
Report Pass
6/3/20  
Engrossed
6/8/20  
Engrossed
6/8/20  
Refer
6/9/20  
Refer
6/9/20  
Refer
6/23/20  
Refer
6/23/20  
Report Pass
7/8/20  
Report Pass
7/8/20  
Refer
7/8/20  
Refer
7/8/20  
Report Pass
7/28/20  
Report Pass
7/28/20  
Refer
7/28/20  
Refer
7/28/20  
Report Pass
8/14/20  
Report Pass
8/14/20  
Refer
8/14/20  
Refer
8/14/20  
Refer
8/19/20  
Report Pass
8/20/20  

Caption

State agencies: meetings.

Impact

The amendments proposed in AB 2028 seek to solidify the public's right to access information regarding state agency actions. By removing exemptions that previously allowed certain meeting items to bypass public scrutiny, the bill promotes accountability and openness within state government. This is a significant shift aimed at dismantling barriers to public participation, making it clear that agency decisions should be made transparently and inclusively.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2028, introduced by Assembly Member Aguiar-Curry, amends the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act to enhance transparency in state agency meetings. The bill mandates that all materials related to agenda items be publicly accessible on the state body's website at least 48 hours before meetings, thereby ensuring that any member of the public can review the information in advance. This change is expected to bolster public engagement and provide Californians with greater opportunity to participate in the state’s legislative processes.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment towards AB 2028 appears to be positive among supporters who emphasize the importance of transparency and public involvement in government actions. They argue that the proposed changes are vital for enhancing civic engagement. Conversely, there are minor concerns regarding the potential administrative burden that increased transparency may place on state agencies, particularly in terms of preparing documentation for public access.

Contention

A notable point of contention rests in balancing transparency with operational efficiency. Critics of the bill express concerns that the stringent requirements for document accessibility may overwhelm state agencies, leading to delays in operations or a diversion of resources. Proponents counter that enhanced transparency ultimately serves the public good and empowers citizens to hold their government accountable. The debate reflects a broader discussion about the appropriate extent of governmental openness in relation to operational capacity.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB339

Local government: open and public meetings.

CA AB1291

State bodies: open meetings.

CA AB1795

Open meetings: remote participation.

CA SB707

Open meetings: meeting and teleconference requirements.

CA AB1276

Local redistricting.

CA SB223

Health care language assistance services.

CA AB764

Local redistricting.