California Assembly Bill AB209

California 2019-2020 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/14/19
• Refer: 2/4/19
• Report Pass: 3/12/19
• Refer: 3/12/19
• Refer: 3/20/19
• Report Pass: 5/16/19
• Engrossed: 5/23/19
• Refer: 5/24/19
• Refer: 6/6/19
• Report Pass: 8/12/19
• Refer: 8/13/19
• Refer: 8/19/19
• Report Pass: 8/30/19
• Enrolled: 9/9/19
• Chaptered: 10/9/19
• Passed: 10/9/19

Caption

Parks: outdoor environmental education: grant program.

Impact

The grant program will prioritize funding for educational programs that promote environmental stewardship and align with California's educational standards. By providing logistical support and funding for program operations, the bill aims to ensure that communities with historically limited access to outdoor education can engage in beneficial recreational activities. This program emphasizes not only accessibility but also the quality of educational experiences offered, incorporating science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) into outdoor education curricula.

Summary

Assembly Bill 209, known as the Outdoor Equity Grants Program, seeks to enhance access to outdoor environmental education for underserved and at-risk populations in California. The bill mandates the Director of Parks and Recreation to create a grant program aimed at facilitating outdoor experiences at state parks and other public lands. This initiative particularly targets individuals from low-income backgrounds, including those eligible for free or reduced-price meals, foster youth, and pupils with limited English proficiency.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around AB 209 appears to be positive, particularly among advocates of educational equity and environmental conservation. Supporters argue that the funding priorities established by the bill will address disparities in access to outdoor recreational opportunities. However, there may be some contention regarding the reliance on private funding as stipulated in the bill, which could raise concerns about sustainability and equity in access to the programs funded by this initiative.

Contention

One notable point of contention involves the bill's provision that allows the Director to accept private donations to support the grant program. Critics might argue that depending on private funds could potentially skew priorities towards initiatives that attract private donations rather than equitably serving all underserved communities. Additionally, the emphasis on defined educational standards may lead to discussions about curriculum relevance and cultural inclusivity in educational content provided through these programs.