California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2198

Introduced
2/12/20  
Introduced
2/12/20  
Refer
2/20/20  
Refer
2/20/20  
Report Pass
5/4/20  
Refer
5/5/20  
Report Pass
5/12/20  
Refer
5/12/20  
Refer
6/2/20  
Report Pass
6/3/20  
Engrossed
6/8/20  
Refer
6/9/20  
Refer
6/23/20  
Report Pass
7/31/20  
Refer
7/31/20  

Caption

Unclaimed property: secure payment of claims.

Impact

One of the most significant impacts of AB 2198 is the reduction of bureaucratic hurdles for claimants. It allows for electronic submission of claim documentation via the Controller's website, thereby catering to a growing preference for online services. The bill also raises the claim threshold that can be submitted online from $5,000 to $10,000, expanding access for a greater number of claimants. By streamlining the claim process, the legislation aims to increase the efficiency of property recovery for individuals and businesses alike, ultimately allowing more citizens to reclaim their assets more easily.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2198, introduced by Assembly Member Ting, aims to enhance the process of managing unclaimed property within California. Specifically, it proposes amendments to the Code of Civil Procedure by adding Section 1543, which provides the California Controller with the authority to implement measures designed to streamline the secure payment of claims for unclaimed property. The bill requires the Controller to take specific actions, such as directly transferring property valued at $5,000 or less to the rightful owners when they can be identified without needing additional documents, thus simplifying and accelerating the claims process.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2198 appears to be generally positive, as stakeholders recognize the necessity of modernizing public systems to reflect current technologies and practices. Legislative discussions indicate support for the bill from various proponents, including advocates for consumer rights and efficiency within government operations. However, there may also be some concerns about the implications of managing such processes electronically, particularly regarding data security and the accurate handling of sensitive financial information.

Contention

Despite its intended benefits, AB 2198 has prompted discussions about the potential risks associated with electronic claims processing. Critics may argue that while digitizing processes can enhance efficiency, it also necessitates robust cybersecurity measures to protect against fraud and data breaches. They might also highlight the need for ensuring that all citizens, especially those who are less tech-savvy, have equal access to these online systems. Therefore, the successful implementation of this bill will require careful consideration of these factors to ensure it fulfills its promise without unintended consequences.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1208

Unclaimed property: secure payment of claims.

KY HB44

AN ACT relating to sales and use tax on marketing services.

KY HB1

AN ACT relating to the individual income tax rate.

KY HB247

AN ACT relating to sales and use taxes.

AK HB142

State Sales And Use Tax

KY HB360

AN ACT relating to fiscal matters and declaring an emergency.

OK HB4080

Public buildings and public works; bonding; contracting; construction; construction management; emergencies; school buildings; wildlife conservation; bids; payment; fees; State Construction Revolving Fund; effective date.

SD HB1019

Clarify language regarding sales and use tax in certain statutes.