By adopting more stringent standards based on European guidelines, AB 2287 aims to improve environmental marketing claims and consumer protections against misleading labels. The bill also mandates the Director of Resources Recycling and Recovery to implement guidelines to determine compliance with plastic product standards. Importantly, it establishes a requirement for businesses generating substantial waste to arrange for recycling services and provide accessible recycling facilities on their premises, particularly in public spaces such as theme and amusement parks. This shift towards greater responsibility on businesses supports California's broader goals of reducing waste and promoting recycling.
Assembly Bill No. 2287, authored by Eggman, amends various sections of the Public Resources Code to enhance the management and regulation of solid waste in California. The bill specifically focuses on the labeling and sale of plastic products, establishing that only those meeting the required ASTM standard specifications or certified as home compostable can be sold in the state. Furthermore, it repeals the conditional prohibition on the sale of marine degradable products, opening the market for those products under new regulations. The bill seeks to align state regulations with European standards for biodegradable plastics, particularly in agricultural applications.
General sentiment surrounding AB 2287 appears supportive, particularly among environmental advocates who view it as a positive step towards better waste management and consumer protection. Proponents argue it addresses the environmental impact of plastic waste effectively, while providing clear guidelines for businesses and consumers. However, some stakeholders may voice concerns regarding the economic impact on businesses that now face new regulatory burdens, especially smaller enterprises navigating compliance with more stringent environmental standards.
Debate regarding AB 2287 has focused on the extent to which it regulates the sale of biodegradable and compostable plastics versus the flexibility allowed in product marketing. Opponents, particularly from business sectors, may contend that these changes could complicate product labeling and compliance processes, potentially leading to increased costs. Moreover, the requirement for adopting specific European standards could raise questions about compatibility with local practices and the overall feasibility for suppliers and manufacturers within California's dynamic market.