California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2362

Introduced
2/18/20  
Refer
2/24/20  
Refer
2/24/20  
Report Pass
5/20/20  
Refer
5/20/20  
Refer
6/2/20  
Report Pass
6/3/20  
Report Pass
6/3/20  
Engrossed
6/10/20  
Refer
6/11/20  
Refer
6/11/20  
Refer
7/1/20  
Refer
7/1/20  
Report Pass
8/8/20  
Refer
8/8/20  
Refer
8/8/20  
Refer
8/14/20  
Refer
8/14/20  
Report Pass
8/17/20  
Report Pass
8/17/20  
Refer
8/17/20  
Refer
8/17/20  
Refer
8/19/20  
Refer
8/19/20  
Report Pass
8/20/20  
Enrolled
8/30/20  
Enrolled
8/30/20  
Chaptered
9/29/20  
Chaptered
9/29/20  

Caption

Firearms dealers: conduct of business.

Impact

If implemented, AB 2362 gives the DOJ the authority to impose civil fines on licensed firearms dealers, up to $1,000 for general violations and up to $3,000 for repeated or egregious violations, particularly when the dealer fails to correct issues after being notified. The funds collected from these fines will be allocated to the Dealers Record of Sale Special Account to support the costs associated with regulating and enforcing firearms laws. This change seeks to enhance accountability among licensees and ensure more robust regulatory oversight in the firearms market.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 2362, introduced by Assemblymember Muratsuchi, aims to amend and add provisions to Section 26800 of the Penal Code, specifically relating to firearms dealers and their conduct of business. The bill outlines the circumstances under which a firearms dealer's license may be subject to forfeiture, emphasizing that violations of specific prohibitions and requirements can lead to civil penalties. The legislation is intended to reinforce compliance among licensed dealers while streamlining enforcement procedures for the Department of Justice (DOJ) concerning firearm regulations.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding AB 2362 appears to be cautiously supportive within legislative discussions. Proponents argue that the measures proposed will not only enhance compliance but also promote safety and better regulation of firearms dealers. However, there may be concerns among some stakeholders about potential overreach in regulation, which could be perceived as burdensome to lawful firearms businesses, thereby creating a degree of contention in the dialogue surrounding the bill.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the balance between regulatory enforcement and the responsibilities imposed on firearms dealers. Advocates of the bill underscore the necessity of strict adherence to regulations given the serious societal implications of firearms sales. In contrast, opponents might argue against the broad authority granted to the DOJ and the impact of increased fines on small businesses operating in the firearms industry. The opposition may view these measures as excessive, undermining the operational viability of compliant dealers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1420

Firearms.

CA AB1064

Firearms dealers: conduct of business.

CA AB311

Firearms: Del Mar Fairgrounds.

CA AB736

Firearms: dealer licensing.

NH SB162

Relative to restrictions on acquisition of ownership, controlling, and occupancy interests in real property by certain foreign principals on or around certain military installations, and criminal penalties and civil forfeiture procedures for illegal acquisition.

NC H468

Regulate Kratom Products

CA AB2102

Cannabis: facilities used for unlawful purposes.

CA SB1381

Crimes: child pornography.