California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2437

Introduced
2/19/20  
Refer
2/27/20  
Report Pass
3/10/20  
Report Pass
3/10/20  
Refer
3/11/20  

Caption

Civil actions: statute of limitations.

Impact

The bill is significant in its impact on the enforcement of the Control, Regulate, and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act (Proposition 64), as it facilitates the ability of licensing authorities, such as the Attorney General and local prosecutors, to impose civil penalties on unlicensed cannabis activities. By clarifying and extending the timeline for initiating actions, it strengthens the state's regulatory framework and aims to enhance compliance among cannabis businesses, ultimately promoting a more secure and controlled cannabis market in California.

Summary

AB2437 is a legislative measure that amends Section 338 of the Code of Civil Procedure to extend the statute of limitations for certain civil actions related to the regulation of cannabis activities in California. Specifically, it pertains to actions that can be taken against individuals or entities engaged in commercial cannabis activities without a state license. The bill reflects a shift from a one-year to a three-year timeframe for agencies to commence these civil actions after the discovery of relevant facts, thereby increasing the time window for enforcement.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around AB2437 appears to be largely supportive among regulatory bodies and proponents of cannabis reform, as it reinforces state control and compliance in a rapidly evolving industry. However, there may be concerns from some business operators about the implications of expanded enforcement measures and the extended timeframe for penalties, potentially leading to increased scrutiny of cannabis-related operations.

Contention

Despite its supportive reception, some points of contention could arise regarding the balance between regulatory oversight and the burden placed on cannabis businesses. Opponents may argue that the extended statute of limitations could lead to increased risks for operators who may inadvertently violate licensing regulations. Additionally, discussions might emerge around the equitable application of civil penalties and the need to ensure that legitimate businesses do not face undue penalties while the regulatory environment continues to stabilize.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB287

Civil actions: statute of limitations.

CA SB1453

Statutes of limitations.

CA AB2073

Public nuisance: abatement: lead-based paint.

CA AB2867

Recovery of artwork and personal property lost due to persecution.

CA AB853

Mountainous, forest-, brush-, and grass-covered lands: timber operations: clearings: notice: enforcement: limitations periods.

CA AB1138

Unlawful cannabis activity: civil enforcement.

CA AB2102

Cannabis: facilities used for unlawful purposes.

CA AB2122

Unlawful cannabis activity: enforcement.